2gether

Developers

Melissa J. Kottke, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A.; Jessica M. Sales, Ph.D.; Peggy Goedken, M.P.H.; Jennifer L. Brown, Ph.D.; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy, Ph.D., M.P.H.; Joan Marie Kraft, Ph.D.; and Athena P. Kourtis, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.

Program Summary

2gether is a multicomponent, clinic-based intervention aimed to increase dual-protection (DP) strategies that target the concurrent prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancies for African American females between ages 14 and 19. The intervention takes place over 11 months through a combination of two individual clinic visits and then follow-ups by phone. The first visit includes an interactive multimedia program on DP strategies (MMDP), one-on-one counseling on DP method selection, and one-on-one health education and counseling for correct and consistent DP use. The second visit includes an abbreviated version of the MMDP and health education and counseling to reinforce skills for correct and consistent DP use. The intervention also includes four individual phone counseling sessions delivered by nurse educators that reinforce the correct and consistent use of DP strategies.

Intended Population

2gether is designed for African American females between 14 and 19 years old. 2gether was evaluated with young African American women ages 14 to 17.

Program Setting

The program was designed for and evaluated in a health clinic.

Contact and Availability Information

Melissa Kottke, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A.
49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, SE
Atlanta, GA 30303
404-712-8730
mkottke@emory.edu 

Sample of Curriculum Available for Review Prior to Purchase
No
Languages Available
English
Monitoring and Evaluation Tools
Monitoring and evaluation tools available
No
Program Components and Core Components

Last updated in 2024

The data presented on this page reflect responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides information on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, context, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program.

In the drop-down menu below, under “Has component,” there are four options that indicate a component as present in the program: (1) “Yes” indicates that the component is present in at least one version of the program (whether that be the program version that was evaluated, the current version, or both versions); (2) “Yes (both versions)” indicates that the component is present in both the evaluated version of the program and the current version of the program; (3) “Yes (current version)” indicates that the component is present in the current, but not the evaluated, version of the program; and (4) “Yes (evaluated version)” indicates that the component is present in the evaluated version of the program, only. Note that for dosage components, the dosage itself is described in the Notes when available.

Some of the components identified are noted as core components of the evidence-based program, but this does not necessarily mean that these components have been rigorously tested and show evidence of effectiveness. Most often developers denoted components as core based on theory or experience in the field. Click here for the list of evidence-based components.

For more details about program components, refer to the FAQ page.

Category Component Core Component Component present Lesson number(s) / activities where present
Content Boundary setting/refusal skills No Yes (evaluated version) Nurse Educator Counseling
Content Child development No
Content Communication skills No Yes (evaluated version) Nurse Educator Counseling
Content Conflict resolution/social problem solving No
Content Connections with trusted adults No
Content Cultural values No
Content No
Content Sex roles No
Content Leadership No
Content Normative beliefs No
Content Parenting skills No
Content Social competence No
Content Social influence/actual vs. perceived social norms No
Content Social support/capital No
Content Identity development No
Content Morals/values No
Content Spirituality No
Content Volunteering/civic engagement No
Content Other No
Content Other No
Content Other No
Delivery mechanism Method: Anonymous question box No
Delivery mechanism Method: Artistic expression No
Delivery mechanism Method: Assessment/survey No
Delivery mechanism Method: Booster session Yes Yes (evaluated version) Throughout
Delivery mechanism Method: Case management No
Delivery mechanism Method: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) No
Delivery mechanism Method: Demonstration Yes Yes (evaluated version) Nurse Educator Counseling
Delivery mechanism Method: Discussion/debrief No
Delivery mechanism Method: Family session No
Delivery mechanism Method: Game No
Delivery mechanism Method: Home visiting No
Delivery mechanism Method: Homework assignment No
Delivery mechanism Method: In-session assignment No
Delivery mechanism Method: Introduction No
Delivery mechanism Method: Lecture No
Delivery mechanism Method: Motivational interviewing Yes Yes (evaluated version) Throughout
Delivery mechanism Method: Music No
Delivery mechanism Method: Parent-focused activity No
Delivery mechanism Method: Peer-to-peer No
Delivery mechanism Method: Public service announcement No
Delivery mechanism Method: Reading No
Delivery mechanism Method: Role play/Practice Yes Yes (evaluated version) Provider and Nurse Educator Counseling
Delivery mechanism Method: Self-guided activity No
Delivery mechanism Method: Service learning No
Delivery mechanism Method: Slide show Yes Yes (evaluated version) MMDP
Delivery mechanism Method: Social media No
Delivery mechanism Method: Spiral learning No
Delivery mechanism Method: Storytelling No
Delivery mechanism Method: Text message No
Program Objectives

2gether strives to increase the knowledge and use of DP strategies throughout the intervention period to concurrently prevent STIs and unintended pregnancies.

Program Content

2gether is informed by the Information-Motivation-Behavior Theory. It uses motivational interviewing techniques focused on skills, self-perceptions of risk, and motivations for preventing both unintended pregnancies and STIs. The intervention is delivered through two individual clinic visits and four individual counseling session phone calls. 
During the first clinic visit, participants take part in the following activities:

  • Use the multi-media dual protection (MMDP) platform to watch video vignettes of young African American females sharing their experiences with relationships; use visual aids to compare DP strategies; answer reflection questions; and participate in interactive activities including games that address common myths and misconceptions about pregnancy, contraception, and STIs 
  • Receive a one-on-one, structured counseling session with medical providers, who use the participant’s answers to the MMDP reflection questions, self-perceptions of risk for STI and pregnancy, and motivations for DP use to select a DP strategy
  • Receive structured health education and counseling with a nurse educator to build skills for correct and consistent DP use in the participant’s unique context 

During the second clinic visit, participants (1) use an abbreviated version of the MMDP that is focused on DP strategies and adherence and (2) receive a one-on-one post-method selection counseling session to reinforce their use of the DP method that was selected. Nurse educators deliver four booster counseling sessions to participants over the phone. These sessions reinforce the correct and consistent use of DP strategies by discussing the participant’s successes, challenges, and plans for the future.

Program Methods

2gether combines several strategies for supporting behavior change. The program uses an interactive, multimedia platform with video vignettes, informational slides, and visual aids. The program also includes motivational interviewing techniques delivered through structured counseling sessions and booster phone calls as well as interactive activities that include role-plays, condom use demonstrations, and journaling.

Program Structure and Timeline

The 2gether intervention takes place over 11 months through a combination of two individual, in-person clinic visits and four individual counseling sessions by phone. During the first individual clinic visit, participants (1) use the multi-media dual protection (MMDP) platform on the web (about 25 minutes), (2) receive a one-on-one DP method selection counseling session (about 15 minutes), and (3) receive a one-on-one, post-method selection counseling session to reinforce DP method use (ranging from about 20 minutes to 45 minutes). During the second individual clinic visit, which occurs six months after the first visit, participants access an abbreviated version of the MMDP (about 10 minutes) and receive counseling with a nurse educator focused on DP strategies, use, and adherence. 

The length of each clinic visit and booster phone call varies depending on each participant’s clinical and counseling needs. Participants receive counseling session calls at three weeks, five months, seven months, and 11 months after the first clinic visit. Clinical services, including testing, should be individualized to the patient and situational needs.

Staffing

The 2gether program is designed to be delivered by medical providers and nurse educators. Medical providers deliver counseling on the selection of DP strategies and nurse educators deliver structured counseling on DP during clinic visits and over the phone.

Staff Training

Medical providers and nurse educators should have a background in the foundations of clinical care in sexual and reproductive health for adolescents before program delivery. For example, staff should be comfortable discussing or delivering DP strategies, comprehensive contraceptive counseling and management, and sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment. Foundations for this information are available in the program.

Medical providers who deliver counseling to youth on contraception and STIs receive training on motivational interviewing and the medical provider facilitator guides from the developer. Medical providers are required to practice using the facilitator guides until they are comfortable with the content. The amount of practice varies based on each facilitator’s baseline experience, although most facilitators can be trained to deliver the program in four to six half-day sessions. 

Program Materials and Resources

Program materials include the multi-media dual protection (MMDP) web platform, the medical provider facilitator guide, the nurse educator facilitator guide, and a facilitator guide for the counseling sessions by phone.

Additional Needs for Implementation

A computer with access to the internet is needed to deliver the MMDP platform.

Fidelity

Fidelity guides have not been developed.

Technical Assistance and Ongoing Support

None

Allowable Adaptations

The developer has not prespecified any allowable adaptations. 

Adaptation Guidelines or Kit
No
Reviewed Studies
Citation High-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment Low Study Rating Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria

Kottke et al. 2022

Kottke et al. 2023

Study Characteristics
Citation Setting Majority Age Group Majority Racial/Ethnic Group Gender Sample Size

Kottke et al. 2022

Health clinic or medical facility 14 to 17 African American or Black Young female

714

Kottke et al. 2023

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Study Findings

Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study

Citation Sexual Activity Number of Sexual Partners Contraceptive Use STIs or HIV Pregnancy

Kottke et al. 2022

n.a. n.a. n.a. Potentially favorable evidence Indeterminate evidence

Kottke et al. 2023

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
KEY
Evidence Indication
Favorable findings
Two or more favorable impacts and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Potentially favorable findings
At least one favorable impact and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Indeterminate findings
Uniformly null findings
Conflicting findings
At least one favorable and at least one unfavorable impact, regardless of null findings
Potentially unfavorable findings
At least one unfavorable impact and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Unfavorable findings
Two or more unfavorable impacts and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Note: n.a. indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within that particular outcome domain, or the study examined outcome measures within that domain but the findings did not meet the review evidence standards.
Detailed Findings
Citation Details

Kottke et al. 2022

The 2gether intervention was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial implemented in a clinical setting. Participants were African American female adolescents who were not pregnant at enrollment, had vaginal sex with a male partner at least once in the previous six months, were self-reported HIV negative, were planning on staying in the study area for the study period, were not previously enrolled in the pilot study, and had a desire to avoid pregnancy for at least 12 months. A total of 1,396 adolescents were assessed, with about half being deemed ineligible; 714 adolescents were randomized, but some were subsequently determined to not be eligible because they either (1) did not complete the enrollment visit, (2) were diagnosed with HIV at enrollment, or (3) were pregnant at enrollment. This left an analytic sample of 685 participants, with 337 assigned to the treatment group and 348 assigned to the control group. Data were collected at a three-month follow-up call, a six-month follow-up visit, a nine-month follow-up call, and a 12-month final follow-up visit. In addition, data on positive STI or pregnancy tests for all participants were collected from medical records. The data collected from these follow-ups were pooled and analyzed cumulatively. The primary analytic approach for assessing program effectiveness was to estimate time to an event (positive STI test or pregnancy) using a proportional hazard model. In addition, the study presented differences in overall rates of outcomes pooled across all observed data collection events. Only the time-to-event analyses meet TPPER reporting requirements.

The study's main outcomes of interest were biologic outcomes (testing positive for chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomonas, and pregnancy). The study showed a statistically significant and favorable effect on the time to trichomonas event (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.59; CI = [0.36, 0.94]; TPPER-calculated effect size based on prevalence rates of the outcomes = -0.27). That is, it took significantly longer for adolescents in the treatment group to experience a trichomonas event than it took for adolescents in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences observed for any of the other outcomes.

There were a number of outcomes outside the scope of review. The combined biologic outcomes were not eligible for review because they pool information across multiple measures (testing positive for STIs and pregnancy). Other outcomes outside of the scope of the review include contraceptive knowledge, contraceptive self-efficacy, STI knowledge, intentions to use a contraceptive, intentions to use condoms, and reports of verbal or physical threats from a partner.

Kottke et al. 2023

This study was ineligible because it did not meet review's screening criteria.

Notes

Some study entries may include more than one citation because each citation examines a different follow-up period from the same study sample, or because each citation examines a different set of outcome measures on the same study sample. A blank cell indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within the particular outcome domain or the findings for the outcome measures within that domain did not meet the review evidence standards.

Information on evidence of effectiveness is available only for studies that received a high or moderate rating. Read the description of the review process for more information on how these programs are identified.

Language directly from the program model developer or authors.