All4You2!

Developers

Karin K. Coyle, Ph.D., Jeffery Douglas, Jr., B.A., Cherry Gardner, M.A., Lisa Sterner, James Walker, B.S., and Vicki Williams, M.S.

Program Summary

All4You2! is designed to reduce the risk of pregnancy and/or sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, by reducing the number of students who have unprotected sexual intercourse. The program approaches this goal through increasing use of effective birth control and/or condom use or reducing the frequency of sexual intercourse. The program aims to change key determinants related to sexual risk taking such as attitudes, beliefs, and perceived norms. 

All4You2! is an adapted version of the evidence-based program All4You!. Both programs are designed to reduce the number of students ages 14-18 who have unprotected sexual intercourse and to change key determinants related to sexual risk taking. All4You2! includes 15, 50-minute sessions spanning 12.5 hours. All4You! includes 9, 70–90-minute skill-based sessions spanning approximately 12 hours, plus an additional service-learning component that was omitted from All4You2!. The program overview for All4You! can be found at https://youth.gov/evidence-innovation/tpper/programs/all4you.

Intended Population

The program was designed for high school age participants of any race or ethnicity, ages 14 to 18, in alternative high schools. All4You2! was evaluated with Hispanic males and females ages 14 to 17.

Program Setting

The program was designed for and evaluated in alternative high schools and community-based settings.

Contact and Availability Information

Program Contact Information
Email: sales@etr.org
Phone: (800) 321-4407
Website: http://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you2/   

Training Contact Information 
Kelly Gainor, M.Ed.
ebptraining@etr.org
Website: http://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you2/

Sample of Curriculum Available for Review Prior to Purchase
Yes
Languages Available
English
Monitoring and Evaluation Tools
Monitoring and evaluation tools available
Yes
Monitoring and evaluation tool usage required
No
Information about available monitoring and evaluation tools (if applicable)

All4You2! includes a simple pre/post-test survey that classroom teachers can use to assess whether students have met short-term learning goals. A fidelity log for tracking implementation of the lessons and a list of core components to help ensure fidelity are also provided on ETR’s website: https://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you2/. 

Program Components and Core Components

Last updated in 2024

The data presented on this page reflect responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides information on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, context, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program.

In the drop-down menu below, under “Has component,” there are four options that indicate a component as present in the program: (1) “Yes” indicates that the component is present in at least one version of the program (whether that be the program version that was evaluated, the current version, or both versions); (2) “Yes (both versions)” indicates that the component is present in both the evaluated version of the program and the current version of the program; (3) “Yes (current version)” indicates that the component is present in the current, but not the evaluated, version of the program; and (4) “Yes (evaluated version)” indicates that the component is present in the evaluated version of the program, only. Note that for dosage components, the dosage itself is described in the Notes when available.

Some of the components identified are noted as core components of the evidence-based program, but this does not necessarily mean that these components have been rigorously tested and show evidence of effectiveness. Most often developers denoted components as core based on theory or experience in the field. Click here for the list of evidence-based components.

For more details about program components, refer to the FAQ page.

Category Component Core Component Component present Lesson number(s) / activities where present
Content Contraception - Condoms Yes Yes (both versions) Lessons 12-13, manual pages 265-306
Content Anatomy/physiology Optional
Content Other
Content Other
Content Other
Content Volunteering/civic engagement No
Content Spirituality No
Content Morals/values
Content Identity development Optional
Content Social support/capital
Content Social influence/actual vs. perceived social norms No
Content Social competence No
Content Parenting skills No
Content Normative beliefs
Content Leadership
Content Sex roles No
Content Optional
Content Cultural values No
Content Connections with trusted adults
Content Conflict resolution/social problem solving No
Content Communication skills No
Content Child development No
Content Boundary setting/refusal skills Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 6, manual pages 117-148
Content Substance use cessation No
Content Substance use - Other drugs No
Content Substance use - Alcohol
Content Substance use - Abstinence No
Content Brain development and substance use No
Content Vocational/skills training No
Content Supplemental academic services No
Content School engagement No
Content Graduating from high school No
Content College preparation No
Content Alternative schooling No
Content Self-regulation
Content Self-esteem No
Content Sexual orientation Optional
Content STIs - Vaccination
Content STIs - Treatment
Content STIs - Screening Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 14, manual pages 307-326
Content STIs - Prevention Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 4, manual pages 73-92
Content STIs - Information Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 1, manual pages 25-40
Content Sexual risk reduction Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 15, manual pages 327-349
Content Sexual risk discontinuation
Content Sexual risk avoidance Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 3, manual pages 55-72
Content Puberty/development Optional
Content Contraception - Long-acting reversible contraceptives Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 11, manual pages 229-264
Content Contraception - Other Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 11, manual pages 229-264
Content Contraception - Pills, patches, rings, and shots Yes Yes (both versions) Lesson 11, manual pages 229-264
Content Maternal health No
Program Objectives

The program’s goals are to reduce the risk of HIV, other STIs, and unplanned pregnancy by reducing the number of students who have unprotected sexual intercourse through increasing effective birth control and/or condom use or reducing the frequency of sexual intercourse. The program also aims to change the key determinants related to sexual risk taking, such as attitudes, beliefs, and perceived norms about condom and contraceptive use and STIs.

Program Content

All4You2! is a 15-session program based on Social Cognitive Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior. It focuses on the following knowledge and behaviors:

  • Functional STI knowledge, including behaviors that increase risk and behaviors to prevent STIs 
  • The influence of multiple partners on STI transmission
  • The potential physical and emotional outcomes of sexual activity
  • Negotiation and refusal skills
  • Skills for identifying and handling risky situations
  • Skills for establishing healthy relationships and ending relationships in healthy ways
  • Contraception and condom use skills
  • Strategies for overcoming barriers to preventing HIV, other STIs, and pregnancy
  • Knowledge of resources for HIV/STI and pregnancy testing and treatment
Program Methods

All4You2! is delivered through mini-lectures, brainstorming, games, small-group work, role plays, guest speakers, and videos.

Program Structure and Timeline

All4You2! consists of 15, 50-minute sessions spanning about 12.5 hours. 

Staffing

Classroom teachers or community-based health educators should deliver the program. Peer leaders may also facilitate some activities.

Staff Training

Program developers highly recommend that educators who plan to teach All4You2! receive professional development to prepare them to effectively implement the curriculum with its intended target group. Educators should have rapport with and respect for young people and their lived experiences. Implementers can request All4You2! training by contacting ebptraining@etr.org.

Program Materials and Resources

Program materials include a teacher guide that outlines teacher instructions and teacher background materials and student workbooks with activity sheets and handouts. Video content is available online. 

Other materials available include surveys that can be administered as a participant knowledge check with a survey answer key, an optional lesson supplement, and an enhanced set of materials that includes videos and posters along with the lesson supplement. 


The program logic models can be found on ETR’s website: http://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you2/. The ETR website also includes the table of contents and a sample lesson: http://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you2/.  
 

Additional Needs for Implementation

None specified.

Fidelity

ETR provides a fidelity log for All4You2! The fidelity log can be found on ETR’s website: https://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you/.

Technical Assistance and Ongoing Support

ETR provides technical assistance (TA) before, during, and after program implementation. TA is tailored to the needs of the site and is designed to support quality assurance, trouble-shoot adaptation issues, and boost implementation.

ETR also provides evaluation support for evidence-based program implementation. For example, TA is available to support process and outcome evaluations and can include assistance with evaluation planning, instrument design and development, implementation fidelity, data management and analysis, performance measurement, continuous quality improvement protocols, and effective tools and strategies for reporting results.

Allowable Adaptations

In-depth adaptation guidelines for All4You2! are available on the ETR website: https://www.etr.org/ebi/programs/all4you2/#adaptation.

Adaptation Guidelines or Kit
Yes
Reviewed Studies
Citation High-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment Low Study Rating Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria

Coyle et al. 2013

Glassman et al. 2014

 

Study Characteristics
Citation Setting Majority Age Group Majority Racial/Ethnic Group Gender Sample Size

Coyle et al. 2013

Glassman et al. 2014

 

Alternative school, Community-based organization 14 to 17 Hispanic or Latino Male and female youth

430

Study Findings

Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study

Citation Sexual Activity Number of Sexual Partners Contraceptive Use STIs or HIV Pregnancy

Coyle et al. 2013

Glassman et al. 2014

 

Indeterminate evidence Indeterminate evidence Potentially favorable evidence n.a. n.a.
KEY
Evidence Indication
Favorable findings
Two or more favorable impacts and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Potentially favorable findings
At least one favorable impact and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Indeterminate findings
Uniformly null findings
Conflicting findings
At least one favorable and at least one unfavorable impact, regardless of null findings
Potentially unfavorable findings
At least one unfavorable impact and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Unfavorable findings
Two or more unfavorable impacts and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Note: n.a. indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within that particular outcome domain, or the study examined outcome measures within that domain but the findings did not meet the review evidence standards.
Detailed Findings
Citation Details

Coyle et al. 2013

Glassman et al. 2014

 

The evaluation was conducted using a four-arm experimental design involving 47 classrooms (765 youth) drawn from 11 district-run continuation high schools in Northern California. Students' school classrooms were randomized into one of four experimental conditions: (1) the All4You2! treatment condition; (2) a service learning condition; (3) the treatment intervention combined with the service learning condition; or (4) an attention control condition. Students completed three surveys (baseline plus two follow-up surveys at six months and 18 months). The All4You2! intervention consisted of 32 hours of instruction, taught two or three times a week during school hours.

This summary presents the effectiveness of the All4You2! treatment relative to the attention control condition.

The results of this study suggest that the treatment group experienced short-term effects (as demonstrated in the six-month survey following baseline) in reducing instances of unprotected sexual intercourse when compared to the control group. For the full sample, the finding for frequency of unprotected sexual intercourse at the six-month follow-up was positive and statistically significant in favor of the treatment group. The TPPER-calculated effect size for this finding was 0.33.

The study also examined outcomes related to number of sexual partners and contraceptive use, though none of these outcomes showed impacts that were statistically significant.

Additionally, the study reported findings that did not meet TPPER standards. One set of findings was reported only for subgroups defined by sexual activity at follow-up; analyses for endogenous subgroups received a low rating. Another set of findings was reported for samples defined by their sexual experience at baseline; however, these contrasts were deemed to have high attrition and did not demonstrate baseline equivalence, so they received a low rating.

Notes

Some study entries may include more than one citation because each citation examines a different follow-up period from the same study sample, or because each citation examines a different set of outcome measures on the same study sample. A blank cell indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within the particular outcome domain or the findings for the outcome measures within that domain did not meet the review evidence standards.

Information on evidence of effectiveness is available only for studies that received a high or moderate rating. Read the description of the review process for more information on how these programs are identified.

Language directly from the program model developer or authors.