Familias Unidas
Familias Unidas can be implemented in any setting and has been delivered in community-based organizations and school settings in the United States and Latin America. The program has been evaluated in community-based settings in Miami.
Familias Unidas can provide tools to measure family functioning, drug use, and sexual risk behaviors. The program also provides fidelity measures.
Last updated in 2024
The data presented on this page reflect responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides information on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, context, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program.
In the drop-down menu below, under “Has component,” there are four options that indicate a component as present in the program: (1) “Yes” indicates that the component is present in at least one version of the program (whether that be the program version that was evaluated, the current version, or both versions); (2) “Yes (both versions)” indicates that the component is present in both the evaluated version of the program and the current version of the program; (3) “Yes (current version)” indicates that the component is present in the current, but not the evaluated, version of the program; and (4) “Yes (evaluated version)” indicates that the component is present in the evaluated version of the program, only. Note that for dosage components, the dosage itself is described in the Notes when available.
Some of the components identified are noted as core components of the evidence-based program, but this does not necessarily mean that these components have been rigorously tested and show evidence of effectiveness. Most often developers denoted components as core based on theory or experience in the field. Click here for the list of evidence-based components.
For more details about program components, refer to the FAQ page.
| Category | Component | Core Component | Component present | Lesson number(s) / activities where present |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Context | Setting: Other | |||
| Context | Other | |||
| Intended population characteristics | Age or grade in school | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Sex | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Ethnicity | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Sex | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | ||||
| Intended population characteristics | Race | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Urbanicity | No | Yes | |
| Intended population characteristics | Homeless or runaway youth | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Youth with developmental disabilities | Optional | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Sexually active youth | Optional | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Pregnant/expectant or parenting | Optional | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Child welfare | No | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Juvenile justice | No | Yes (evaluated version) | |
| Intended population characteristics | Population-specific needs/challenges | Yes | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Population-specific strengths | Yes | ||
| Intended population characteristics | Other |
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 4
- Familias Unidas Manual
- Clinical Supervision Manual
- Parent Handbook
- Adherence Manual
- Adherence forms for family sessions
- Adherence forms for group sessions
- Skills videos
Recording equipment is necessary to capture group and family sessions.
| Citation | High-Quality Randomized Trial | Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial | Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment | Low Study Rating | Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prado et al. 2012 Prado et al. 2013 |
|||||
| Estrada et al. 2015 |
|||||
| Estrada et al. 2017 |
|||||
| Ocasio et al. 2022 |
| Citation | Setting | Majority Age Group | Majority Racial/Ethnic Group | Gender | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prado et al. 2012 Prado et al. 2013 |
After school | 14 to 17 | Hispanic or Latino | Male and female youth | 242 |
Estrada et al. 2015 |
Multiple settings | 14 to 17 | Hispanic or Latino | Male and female youth | 160 |
Estrada et al. 2017 |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Ocasio et al. 2022 |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study
| Citation | Sexual Activity | Number of Sexual Partners | Contraceptive Use | STIs or HIV | Pregnancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prado et al. 2012 Prado et al. 2013 |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
|
n.a. |
Estrada et al. 2015 |
|
n.a. |
|
n.a. | n.a. |
Estrada et al. 2017 |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Ocasio et al. 2022 |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Citation | Details |
|---|---|
Prado et al. 2012 Prado et al. 2013 |
The study evaluated Familias Unidas using a randomized controlled trial that involved 242 juvenile justice youth and their families in Miami-Dade County. Surveys in the study were administered before the program (baseline) and again six months after the baseline. |
Estrada et al. 2015 |
A more recent study involving 160 students in Miami-Dade County high schools and their families examined the effectiveness of Brief Familias Unidas using a randomized controlled trial. Brief Familias Unidas is an adapted version of the Familias Unidas program that reduces the duration of the intervention to include five parent sessions (compared to eight in the full length program) and one family visit (compared to four in the full length program). The study collected data before random assignment (baseline) and again 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline. |
Estrada et al. 2017 |
The study received a low study quality rating because it only presented findings for endogenous subgroups. |
Ocasio et al. 2022 |
This study was ineligible because it did not meet review's screening criteria. |
Language directly from the program model developer or authors.