Health Improvement Project for Teens (HIP Teens)
The program designed to be delivered in multiple settings. The program was evaluated with participants recruited from youth development centers, adolescent health service centers, and school-based centers.
Dianne Morrison-Beedy, PhD, RN, WHNP-BC, FAANP, FNAP, FAAN
HIP4Change, LLC
4201 W. McKay Ave.
Tampa, FL 33609
Ph: 813-230-3335
Email: hip4change@gmail.com
Website: www.hip4change.com
HIP Teens provides two fidelity assessments for content and process, and outcome measures on knowledge, motivation and attitudes, skills, and behavioral outcome measures.
Last updated in 2023
The data presented on this page reflects responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides data on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, environment, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program. For more details, refer to the FAQ.
Category | Component | Core Component | Component present | Notes | Lesson number(s) / activities where present |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content | Boundary setting/refusal skills | Yes | Yes (both versions) | Session 2, pg. 37-38; Session 4, pg. 58 | |
Content | Child development | No | No | ||
Content | Communication skills | Yes | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, pg. 19, Session 2, pg. 37-39; Session 4, pg. 58 | |
Content | Conflict resolution/social problem solving | Yes | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, pg. 19, Session 2, pg. 37-39; Session 4, pg. 58 | |
Content | Connections with trusted adults | Yes | Yes (both versions) | ||
Content | Cultural values | No | No | ||
Content | Gender identity | No | No | ||
Content | Gender roles | No | No | ||
Content | Leadership | No | No | ||
Content | Normative beliefs | No | No | ||
Content | Parenting skills | No | No | ||
Content | Social competence | Yes | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, pg. 19, Session 2, pg. 37-39; Session 4, pg. 58 | |
Content | Social influence/actual vs. perceived social norms | No | No | ||
Content | Social support/capital | Yes | Yes (both versions) | ||
Content | Identity development | No | |||
Content | Morals/values | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, pg. 6-8 | ||
Content | Spirituality | No | |||
Content | Volunteering/civic engagement | No | |||
Content | Other | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Anonymous question box | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Artistic expression | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Assessment/survey | Yes (both versions) | Session 2, pg. 25 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Booster session | Yes (both versions) | Booster Sessions 1 + 2 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Case management | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Demonstration | Yes (both versions) | Session 3, pg. 47-49 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Discussion/debrief | Yes (both versions) | All Sessions | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Family session | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Game | Yes (both versions) | Session 4, pg. 59-62 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Home visiting | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Homework assignment | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, pg. 21; Session 3, pg. 53 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: In-session assignment | Yes (both versions) | Session 2, pg. 23 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Introduction | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, Manual Pg. 3-4 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Lecture | Yes (both versions) | Sessions 1-2, pg. 34-35 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Motivational interviewing | Yes (both versions) | Session 2, pg. 31-33 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Music | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Parent-focused activity | Yes (both versions) | Take home activities in workbook | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Peer-to-peer | Optional | Peer facilitators have been trained for community college interventions | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Public service announcement | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Reading | Yes (both versions) | Booster Sessions 1 + 2 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Role play/Practice | Yes (both versions) | Session 1, pg. 20-21 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Self-guided activity | Yes (both versions) | Booster Sessions 1 + 2 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Service learning | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Slide show | Yes (both versions) | All sessions | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Social media | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Spiral learning | Yes (both versions) | Session 2, pg. 37-39; Session 3, pg. 51-52 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Storytelling | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Text message | No | |||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Video | Yes (both versions) | Session 2, pg. 37-39; Session 3, pg. 51-52; Session 4, pg. 58 | ||
Delivery mechanism | Method: Other | Yes (both versions) | Interactive games and video role plays |
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 2
- Next page
This evidence-based intervention is theoretically-driven by the Information - Motivation - Behavioral Skills (IMB) model. Participants receive information about HIV and risk reduction, increase readiness to reduce risk behaviors, and practice interpersonal and self-management skills to reduce sexual risk behaviors and increase condom use.
Component 1: Intervention Sessions. The 4 sessions cover the following topics:
● Session 1: Adolescents identify values and develop future time perspective, learn about HIV and risk reduction, analyze their own relationships and behaviors, and skills practice and role play with assertive communication and negotiation.
● Session 2: Participants discuss the risks involved in sexual activity, learn about safer versus less safe behaviors, increase motivation to reduce risk, develop strategies for behavior change and communication through role plays, and identify a menu of choices that may lead to healthier sexual behavior including abstinence and condom use.
● Session 3: Participants discuss the role of goal setting in changing behavior, receive information and practice correct condom use, build upon communication skills through video clip role plays and how to identify triggers than can lead to unsafe sexual behaviors.
● Session 4: Adolescents identify long-term life goals, practice using assertive communication, review important risk reduction information from previous sessions, discuss plans and motivation for avoiding risks and achieving healthy behaviors.
Component 2: Booster Sessions. These 90-minute sessions are designed as "reunion" sessions for the groups and intended to reinforce program messages and skills.
HIP Teens is provided over four 2-hour sessions or eight 1-hour sessions, although some organizations have conducted two half day programs. The two 90-minute booster sessions are administered in small groups at three and six months after the end of the intervention.
The most important characteristic of being a successful HIP Teens facilitator is a commitment to helping participants without being judgmental. Trained facilitators implementing this program should be same gender and may be from a variety of ethnicities, ages, and backgrounds.
Purchasers of the program should contact the developer (Dianne Morrison-Beedy, Ph.D., R.N., W.H.N.P.-B.C., hip4change@gmail.com) for more information.
Citation | High-Quality Randomized Trial | Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial | Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment | Low Study Rating | Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013a Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013b |
✓ |
Citation | Setting | Majority Age Group | Majority Racial/Ethnic Group | Gender | Sample Size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013a Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013b |
After school | 14 to 17 | African American or Black | Young women | 639 |
Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study
Citation | Sexual Activity | Number of Sexual Partners | Contraceptive Use | STIs or HIV | Pregnancy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013a Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013b |
|
|
|
n.a. | n.a. |
Citation | Details |
---|---|
Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013a Morrison-Beedy et al. 2013b |
The program was evaluated with a randomized controlled trial involving sexually active girls recruited from youth development centers, adolescent health service centers, and school-based centers in New York. About half the participants were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and half were assigned to a health promotion control condition that received general health information on nutrition, breast health, and anger management. Researchers administered surveys immediately before random assignment (baseline) and at three, six, and 12 months after the intervention. The study found that six months after the intervention ended, adolescents participating in the intervention reported a significantly lower rate of vaginal sex, a lower frequency of vaginal sex, a lower rate of unprotected vaginal sex, and fewer sexual partners. The study found no statistically significant program impacts on the frequency of unprotected vaginal sex. In addition, the study found no statistically significant program impacts on sexual behavior outcomes at the time of the follow-ups conducted three and 12 months after the intervention ended. The study also examined program impacts on measures of pregnancy, sexually transmitted infection, and unprotected sex with a 'steady' partner and 'non-steady' partner. Findings for pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection were not considered for this review because the measures were assessed for only about half (51 percent) of the study sample. Findings for the measures of unprotected sex with a steady and non-steady partner were not considered for the review because they fall outside the scope of the review. |