Breadcrumb

  1. Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review
  2. Programs
  3. High School FLASH, 3rd Edition

High School FLASH, 3rd Edition

Developers

Public Health - Seattle and King County

Program Summary

High School FLASH is a sexual health education curriculum designed for classroom settings in grades 9–12. The program aims to (1) prevent unintended pregnancy, HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and sexual violence; (2) increase knowledge about reproductive and sexual health; and (3) improve family communication about relationships and reproductive health. FLASH covers the following topics: healthy relationships, communication, decision making, online safety, coercion and consent, pregnancy, the reproductive system, sexual orientation, abstinence, birth control and condoms, HIV and STD prevention, STD testing, and improving school health. 

Intended Population

The program is designed for and was evaluated with high school students in grades 9–12.

Program Setting

The program is designed for and was evaluated in high school classrooms, though it has been implemented in a wide variety of settings.

Contact and Availability Information

For curriculum, materials, and pricing information, please contact:
Website https://kingcounty.gov/flash.
Email FLASH@kingcounty.gov. 

For training and support, please contact:
Website https://kingcounty.gov/flash.
Email FLASH@kingcounty.gov.

Sample of Curriculum Available for Review Prior to Purchase
Yes
Languages Available
English, Spanish
Monitoring and Evaluation Tools
Monitoring and evaluation tools available
Yes
Monitoring and evaluation tool usage required
No
Information about available monitoring and evaluation tools (if applicable)

High School FLASH provides observation and fidelity forms for each lesson. In addition, it provides core components, adaptation guidance, a logic model, and medical accuracy overview.

Program Components and Core Components

Last updated in 2024

The data presented on this page reflect responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides information on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, context, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program.

In the drop-down menu below, under “Has component,” there are four options that indicate a component as present in the program: (1) “Yes” indicates that the component is present in at least one version of the program (whether that be the program version that was evaluated, the current version, or both versions); (2) “Yes (both versions)” indicates that the component is present in both the evaluated version of the program and the current version of the program; (3) “Yes (current version)” indicates that the component is present in the current, but not the evaluated, version of the program; and (4) “Yes (evaluated version)” indicates that the component is present in the evaluated version of the program, only. Note that for dosage components, the dosage itself is described in the Notes when available.

Some of the components identified are noted as core components of the evidence-based program, but this does not necessarily mean that these components have been rigorously tested and show evidence of effectiveness. Most often developers denoted components as core based on theory or experience in the field. Click here for the list of evidence-based components.

For more details about program components, refer to the FAQ page.

Category Component Core Component Component present Lesson number(s) / activities where present
Delivery mechanism Other No No
Dosage Frequency Yes
Dosage Intensity Yes
Dosage Duration Yes
Dosage Other
Staffing Deliverer: Community health worker Optional
Staffing Deliverer: Faith-based individual Optional
Staffing Deliverer: Health educator Yes (evaluated version)
Staffing Deliverer: Mental health provider Optional
Staffing Deliverer: Mentors No
Staffing Deliverer: Parents/family No
Staffing Deliverer: Peers No
Staffing Deliverer: Primary care provider No
Staffing Deliverer: Social worker and/or counselor Optional
Staffing Deliverer: Teachers Yes (evaluated version)
Staffing Deliverer: Other
Staffing Experience: Credentials No
Staffing Experience: Education Yes (evaluated version)
Staffing Experience: Other
Staffing Number of staff providing services Yes (evaluated version)
Staffing Training: Additional training required No
Staffing Training: Developer-led training required No
Staffing Training: Other Yes (current version)
Staffing Other
Format Group size: Full-group activity Yes Yes (evaluated version) Lessons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Format Group size: Independent/individual activity Yes (evaluated version) Lesson 11
Format Group size: Small-group activity Yes Yes (evaluated version) Lessons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Format Group size: Other
Format Mode: In-person No Yes (evaluated version) All lessons
Format Mode: Phone (audio) No No
Format Mode: Phone (text) No No
Format Mode: Phone (app) No No
Format Mode: Online/computer (asynchronous) No No
Format Mode: Online/computer (synchronous) No Optional
Format Mode: Other
Format Other
Context Context: Environmental supports No No
Context Context: Environmental constraints No No
Context Context: Other
Context Setting: After school No Optional
Context Setting: Community based No Optional
Context Setting: Correctional facility No Optional
Context Setting: Faith based No Optional
Context Setting: Health care clinic No No
Context Setting: Home-based case management No No
Context Setting: Home/housing No No
Context Setting: In school (during the school day) No Yes (evaluated version)
Context Setting: Mental health clinic No Optional
Context Setting: Residential facility No Optional
Context Setting: School-based health clinic No No
Program Objectives

The program aims to (1) prevent unintended pregnancy, HIV and other STDs, and sexual violence; (2) increase knowledge about reproductive and sexual health; and (3) improve family communication about relationships and reproductive health.

Program Content

FLASH covers the following topics: healthy relationships, communication, decision making, online safety, coercion and consent, pregnancy, the reproductive system, sexual orientation, abstinence, birth control and condoms, HIV and STD prevention, STD testing, and improving school health.

Program Methods

The program is delivered through large and small group discussions, interactive activities, role-plays, demonstrations, skills practice, worksheets, and family homework assignments.

Program Structure and Timeline

The program consists of 15 50-minute sessions, offered daily to weekly. It can be adapted for block schedules and multi-hour workshops. FLASH is most commonly delivered over three to five weeks, but implementation is flexible. 

Staffing

The program is delivered by classroom teachers or community-based educators.

Staff Training

FLASH educator training is available but not required. The following resources are available:

  • Self-guided FLASH teacher training modules (asynchronous)
  • FLASH training offered by FLASH instructors (live, remote) 
  • FLASH professional development assessment tool 

Website https://kingcounty.gov/flash.
Email FLASH@kingcounty.gov. 

Program Materials and Resources

The curriculum is available in two formats:

  • Printed curriculum in a three-ring binder with tabs
  • Online paperless curriculum (only the student materials can be printed from the online version)

The following materials and resources are available:

  • Implementation toolkit
  • Student- and parent-facing materials in English and Spanish
  • Pre-tests and post-tests for each lesson, aligned to national health standards
  • Materials for review committees and parent preview
  • All lessons are available in asynchronous format for independent study to provide flexibility during the pandemic.
Additional Needs for Implementation

None

Fidelity

The following resources are available:

  • Implementation toolkit
  • Facilitator forms for each lesson
  • Observation forms for each lesson
  • Logic model
  • Red/yellow/green light adaptation guidance
  • Core components
  • FLASH evaluation overview
  • Medical accuracy overview
  • Trauma-informed overview
  • Age appropriateness overview
Technical Assistance and Ongoing Support

Contact the developers at FLASH@kingcounty.gov for assistance.

Allowable Adaptations

High School FLASH is a flexible curriculum. Please see the red/yellow/green light adaptation guidance at https://kingcounty.gov/flash.

Adaptation Guidelines or Kit
Yes
Reviewed Studies
Citation High-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment Low Study Rating Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria

Coyle et al., 2021

Study Characteristics
Citation Setting Majority Age Group Majority Racial/Ethnic Group Gender Sample Size

Coyle et al., 2021

In school: High school 14 to 17 African American or Black Male and female youth

1734

Study Findings

Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study

Citation Sexual Activity Number of Sexual Partners Contraceptive Use STIs or HIV Pregnancy

Coyle et al., 2021

Indeterminate evidence n.a. Potentially favorable evidence n.a. n.a.
KEY
Evidence Indication
Favorable findings
Two or more favorable impacts and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Potentially favorable findings
At least one favorable impact and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Indeterminate findings
Uniformly null findings
Conflicting findings
At least one favorable and at least one unfavorable impact, regardless of null findings
Potentially unfavorable findings
At least one unfavorable impact and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Unfavorable findings
Two or more unfavorable impacts and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Note: n.a. indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within that particular outcome domain, or the study examined outcome measures within that domain but the findings did not meet the review evidence standards.
Detailed Findings
Citation Details

Coyle et al., 2021

The program was evaluated using a randomized controlled trial involving 9th and 10th graders recruited from seven school districts in the midwestern and southern regions of the United States. Teenage birth rates were at or above the national average in these school districts. Twenty schools were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received the 15-session FLASH program or a control group that received a five-session, knowledge-based sexual health curriculum. Surveys were administered three months and 12 months after the end of the FLASH program.



The study found that among the subgroup of youth who were sexually inexperienced at baseline, youth participating in FLASH were significantly less likely to report having had vaginal sex without condoms or other birth control in the prior three months than youth in the control group were (effect size = -0.67). This impact was measured three months after the program ended. The impacts were no longer statistically significant by the 12-month follow-up, however.



Three and 12 months after the end of the FLASH program, the study found no statistically significant program impacts for the full sample on the prevalence of vaginal sex in the past three months or the prevalence of vaginal sex without contraception in the past three months. The study also found no statistically significant effect on initiation of vaginal sex among the sexually inexperienced sample, either at the three-month or the 12-month follow-up.



The study also examined program impacts on measures of increased knowledge and attitudes about STI testing and increased comfort with communication with parents about sexual health. Findings for these outcomes were not considered because they fell outside the scope of the review.

Notes

Some study entries may include more than one citation because each citation examines a different follow-up period from the same study sample, or because each citation examines a different set of outcome measures on the same study sample. A blank cell indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within the particular outcome domain or the findings for the outcome measures within that domain did not meet the review evidence standards.

Information on evidence of effectiveness is available only for studies that received a high or moderate rating. Read the description of the review process for more information on how these programs are identified.

Language directly from the program model developer or authors.