Love Notes (for ages 14-24)
Love Notes was designed to be delivered in a variety of settings including schools, community-based organizations, faith-based agencies, community centers, social service agencies, and workforce development programs. Love Notes was evaluated in community-based organizations.
The Dibble Institute at https://www.dibbleinstitute.org/lovenotes
The Dibble Institute
P. O. Box 7881
Berkeley, CA 94707-0881 www.DibbleInstitute.org
RelationshipSkills@DibbleInstitute.org
Phone: 1-800-695-7975
Fax: 1-800-695-7975
Love Notes includes fidelity aids and checklists with the Evidence-Based Program (EBP) Model Manual for Love Notes. These include an annotated slide deck for the instructor, observational fidelity tools for coaches and evaluators, facilitator quality measures, a participant reaction questionnaire, questionnaires on participants’ perceptions of the facilitator and group cohesion, and a Love Notes knowledge test. Furthermore, upon request, The Dibble Institute can offer suggested related scales that could be used as part of a survey (such as measures to assess attitudinal and behavioral outcomes regarding sex, pregnancy, relationship quality, communication, conflict, control, violence, and intentions, etc.).
Last updated in 2024
The data presented on this page reflect responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides information on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, context, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program.
In the drop-down menu below, under “Has component,” there are four options that indicate a component as present in the program: (1) “Yes” indicates that the component is present in at least one version of the program (whether that be the program version that was evaluated, the current version, or both versions); (2) “Yes (both versions)” indicates that the component is present in both the evaluated version of the program and the current version of the program; (3) “Yes (current version)” indicates that the component is present in the current, but not the evaluated, version of the program; and (4) “Yes (evaluated version)” indicates that the component is present in the evaluated version of the program, only. Note that for dosage components, the dosage itself is described in the Notes when available.
Some of the components identified are noted as core components of the evidence-based program, but this does not necessarily mean that these components have been rigorously tested and show evidence of effectiveness. Most often developers denoted components as core based on theory or experience in the field. Click here for the list of evidence-based components.
For more details about program components, refer to the FAQ page.
| Category | Component | Core Component | Component present | Lesson number(s) / activities where present |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery mechanism | Other | |||
| Dosage | Frequency | No | Yes | |
| Dosage | Intensity | No | Yes | |
| Dosage | Duration | Yes | Yes | |
| Dosage | Other | |||
| Staffing | Deliverer: Community health worker | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Faith-based individual | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Health educator | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Mental health provider | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Mentors | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Parents/family | No | No | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Peers | No | Optional | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Primary care provider | No | No | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Social worker and/or counselor | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Teachers | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Deliverer: Other | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Experience: Credentials | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Experience: Education | No | Optional | |
| Staffing | Experience: Other | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Number of staff providing services | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Training: Additional training required | No | No | |
| Staffing | Training: Developer-led training required | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Training: Other | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Staffing | Other | |||
| Format | Group size: Full-group activity | Yes | Yes (both versions) | There are scores and scores of small, large and individual activities throughout--in each lesson |
| Format | Group size: Independent/individual activity | Yes | Yes (both versions) | Ditto from above |
| Format | Group size: Small-group activity | Yes | Yes (both versions) | Ditto from above |
| Format | Group size: Other | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Format | Mode: In-person | Yes | Yes (both versions) | |
| Format | Mode: Phone (audio) | No | No | |
| Format | Mode: Phone (text) | No | No | |
| Format | Mode: Phone (app) | No | No | |
| Format | Mode: Online/computer (asynchronous) | No | No | |
| Format | Mode: Online/computer (synchronous) | No | Optional | |
| Format | Mode: Other | No | ||
| Format | Other | |||
| Context | Setting: Home/housing | No | Optional | |
| Context | Context: Environmental supports | No | Optional | |
| Context | Context: Environmental constraints | No | Optional | |
| Context | Context: Other | No | ||
| Context | Setting: After school | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Context | Setting: Community based | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Context | Setting: Correctional facility | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Context | Setting: Faith based | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Context | Setting: Health care clinic | No | Optional | |
| Context | Setting: Home-based case management | No | No | |
| Context | Setting: In school (during the school day) | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Context | Setting: Mental health clinic | No | Optional | |
| Context | Setting: Residential facility | No | Yes (both versions) | |
| Context | Setting: School-based health clinic | No | Optional |
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 3
- Next page
Love Notes aims to achieve these goals by integrating relationship skills with pregnancy prevention and workforce readiness, with practical strategies for motivating change. The model relies on:
- A realistic context for learning that incorporates language, values and scenarios that is relevant to this audience.
- An appeal to aspirations that helps youth to cultivate a personal vision for love, intimacy, and success.
- New motivations for behavioral change, such as exploring, from a child’s perspective, the impact of unplanned pregnancy and unstable relationships.
- Empowerment to achieve healthy relationships at home and at work through both knowledge and practical skills.
- Relationships Today
- Knowing Yourself
- My Expectations–My Future
- Attractions and Starting Relationships
- Principles of Smart Relationships
- Is It a Healthy Relationship?
- Dangerous Love
- Decide, Don't Slide! Pathways & Sequences Toward Success
- Communication and Healthy Relationships
- Communication Challenges and More Skills
- Let's Talk About Sex
- Let's Plan for Choices
- Through the Eyes of a Child
Intervention materials include:
- Love Notes Instructor’s Manual
- Love Notes Participant Journals (in hard copy or digital format)
- Primary Colors Personality Tool
- PowerPoint slideshow for each lesson—downloaded directly from website with purchase of the manual
A computer and projector are needed for each lesson’s PowerPoint slides. Other materials include art supplies, candies, and other readily available teaching materials.
Love Notes Participant Journals (available in hard copy of electronic form) can be purchased in bulk along with the Primary Colors Personality Tool from the Dibble website: www.dibbleinstitute.org, or call 800-695-7975.
The following fidelity aids and checklists are included with the EBP Model Manual:
- Annotated slide deck to focus the instructor on key content.
- Observational fidelity tools for coaches and evaluators
- Facilitator quality measures
- Participant reaction questionnaire
- Participant perceptions of facilitator engagement and group cohesion questionnaires
- Love Notes knowledge test
- Inventory of related scales that can assess attitudinal and behavioral outcomes regarding sex, relationship quality, communication, conflict, control, violence as well as mediators.
Training clients receive technical assistance as part of their training package. Love Notes offers 2 hours of complimentary consultation per organization that have attended a Dibble training. In addition, further TA and evaluation is available.
- Add additional content from the Love Notes Complete Instructor’s Manual based on participant need and available time.
- Include Love Notes activities for expecting and parenting teens.
- Exchange “All Falls Down” for “Toothpaste” DVDs based on participant need.
For activities that do not directly relate to Love Note’s content, organizations may:
- Change the first names in the scenarios to reflect the participants’ culture and sex.
- Add icebreakers or energizers at the start of each session or between modules if delivering during an extended period of time.
Program Delivery:
- Deliver lengthened sessions.
- Increase the number and frequency of Love Notes sessions.
- Use exercises, share facts, or make reminders about key concepts as part of booster text or sessions.
- Provide make-up sessions.
- Use modules with young adults up to age 24.
Unallowable Adaptations
- Delivery without using the Love Notes PowerPoints and Participant Journal.
- Delivery by a facilitator who has not attended a LN-EBP Dibble Certified Training.
- Skipping content or activities from the Evidence Based Model.
All adaptation changes must be reviewed and approved in the context of maintaining fidelity to the core components.
| Citation | High-Quality Randomized Trial | Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial | Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment | Low Study Rating | Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cunningham et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2022 |
| Citation | Setting | Majority Age Group | Majority Racial/Ethnic Group | Gender | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cunningham et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2022 |
After school | 14 to 17 | African American or Black | Male and female youth | 933 |
Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study
| Citation | Sexual Activity | Number of Sexual Partners | Contraceptive Use | STIs or HIV | Pregnancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cunningham et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2022 |
|
|
|
n.a. |
|
| Citation | Details |
|---|---|
Cunningham et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2016 Barbee et al. 2022 |
"The program was evaluated with a cluster randomized control trial involving 23 community-based organizations in Louisville, Kentucky. Youth were recruited into the study on a rolling basis in small groups. Each group was randomly assigned to one of three research conditions: (1) a treatment group receiving the Loves Notes (for ages 14-24) intervention; (2) a treatment group receiving the Reducing the Risk intervention; or (3) a control group receiving a program on neighborhood assets and community change. Data for the study were collected before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and at three, six, 12, and 24 months after the end of the intervention. The manuscripts included in this review focused on data collected at the three-, six-, and 12-month follow-ups. Six months after the end of the intervention, the study found that adolescents in the Loves Notes (for ages 14-24) group were less likely than those in the control group to report ever having sex (effect size = -0.19), having any sexual activity in the past three months (effect size = -0.18), having sex without a condom in the past three months (effect size = -0.22), having sex without using birth control in the past three months (effect size = -0.28), and ever being pregnant (effect size = -0.17). The study found no statistically significant program impacts on measures of number of sexual partners or pregnancy in the last three months. The study found no statistically significant program impacts on any of these outcomes for the three- or 12-month follow-up surveys. The study also examined impacts of Loves Notes (for ages 14-24) on negative attitudes about teen pregnancy and the success sequence (the likelihood that youth thought they would order their lives in a conventional way). Findings for these outcomes were not considered for the review because they fell outside the scope of the review. Finally, the study examined impacts of Loves Notes (for ages 14-24) on a measure of pregnancy (or causing a pregnancy) within the first year after the end of the intervention. Findings for that outcome measure were not considered for the review because they did not meet the review evidence standards. Specifically, the review had concerns about sample composition change, and the analyses of that outcome did not meet the TPPER baseline equivalence requirement." |
Language directly from the program model developer or authors.