Peer Group Connection – High School (PGC-HS)

Developers

Center for Supportive Schools (www.supportiveschools.org)

Program Summary

Peer Group Connection - High School (PGC-HS) is a cross-age, peer-to-peer group mentoring program for 9th grade students, designed to facilitate the transition from middle to high school and to develop social and emotional skills, enhance student engagement, and improve educational outcomes. The program encourages and supports 11th and 12th grade students to become peer leaders for 9th graders. The program includes 18 weekly 45-minute outreach sessions for 9th grade students.

Intended Population

The program is designed to be delivered by 11th and 12th grade student peer leaders to 9th grade students. The program was evaluated with youth between the ages of 14 and 17.

Program Setting

PGC-HS is designed for and evaluated in high school classrooms during the school day.

Contact and Availability Information

For curriculum, materials, and pricing information, please contact:
Dr. Margo Ross, Managing Director, Communications & Development
Center for Supportive Schools
(609) 252-9300 x 113
mross@supportiveschools.org

For training and support, please contact:
Dr. Margo Ross, Managing Director, Communications & Development
Center for Supportive Schools
(609) 252-9300 x 113
mross@supportiveschools.org 

Sample of Curriculum Available for Review Prior to Purchase
Yes
Languages Available
English, Spanish
Monitoring and Evaluation Tools
Monitoring and evaluation tools available
Yes
Monitoring and evaluation tool usage required
Yes
Information about available monitoring and evaluation tools (if applicable)

The CSS will conduct site visits and class observations during program implementation. During the class observations, observers complete rating scales and take notes to capture the degree to which faculty advisors and peer leaders implement the program with fidelity. 
Schools also complete an online implementation tracking tool at multiple points throughout the school year to report implementation of key program components. An online end-of-year feedback form is completed by peer leaders, 9th grade mentees, faculty advisors, and stakeholder team members to assess perceived benefits of the program.

Program Components and Core Components

Last updated in 2024

The data presented on this page reflect responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides information on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, context, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program. In the drop-down menu below, under “Has component,” there are four options that indicate a component as present in the program: (1) “Yes” indicates that the component is present in at least one version of the program (whether that be the program version that was evaluated, the current version, or both versions); (2) “Yes (both versions)” indicates that the component is present in both the evaluated version of the program and the current version of the program; (3) “Yes (current version)” indicates that the component is present in the current, but not the evaluated, version of the program; and (4) “Yes (evaluated version)” indicates that the component is present in the evaluated version of the program, only. Note that for dosage components, the only possible response option was “Yes”, and the dosage is described in the Notes when available. For more details, refer to the FAQ. Some of the components identified are noted as core components of the evidence-based program, but this does not necessarily mean that these components have been rigorously tested and show evidence of effectiveness. Most often developers denoted components as core based on theory or experience in the field. Click here for the list of evidence-based components.

Category Component Core Component Component present Notes Lesson number(s) / activities where present
Content Boundary setting/refusal skills Yes Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #20: Decisions, Decisions; Outreach #21: Clear Communication; Outreach #22: Pressure Zone; Outreach #23: Think Before You Click
Content Child development No
Content Communication skills Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #21: Clear Communication
Content Conflict resolution/social problem solving Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #20: Decisions, Decisions; Outreach #21: Clear Communication; Outreach #22: Pressure Zone; Outreach #23: Think Before You Click
Content Connections with trusted adults Yes (evaluated version) Family Night
Content Cultural values Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #13: Identity Stories
Content Gender identity No
Content Gender roles No
Content Leadership Yes Yes (evaluated version)
Content Normative beliefs No
Content Parenting skills Yes Yes (evaluated version) Family Night
Content Social competence Yes Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #7: Creating a Caring Community; Outreach #10: Me as a Tree; Outreach #18: The Power of We; Outreach #21: Clear Communication; Outreach #22: Pressure Zone
Content Social influence/actual vs. perceived social norms No
Content Social support/capital Yes Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #7: Creating a Caring Community; Outreach #10: Me as a Tree; Outreach #18: The Power of We; Outreach #21: Clear Communication; Outreach #22: Pressure Zone; Outreach #25: Looking Back
Content Identity development Yes Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #4: Pieces of Me; Outreach #5: Two Facts and a Fiction; Outreach #13: Identity Stories
Content Morals/values No Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #13: Identity Stories
Content Spirituality No Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #13: Identity Stories
Content Volunteering/civic engagement Yes Yes (evaluated version) Service Learning (Option 1 or Option 2)
Content Other
Delivery mechanism Method: Anonymous question box No
Delivery mechanism Method: Artistic expression No Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #8: I Am...; Outreach #10: Me as a Tree
Delivery mechanism Method: Assessment/survey No Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #20: Decisions, Decisions
Delivery mechanism Method: Booster session No Yes (evaluated version) Booster Session Packet (used with participants as 10th graders)
Delivery mechanism Method: Case management No
Delivery mechanism Method: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) No
Delivery mechanism Method: Demonstration Yes Yes (evaluated version) Throughout all activities
Delivery mechanism Method: Discussion/debrief Yes Yes (evaluated version) Throughout all activities
Delivery mechanism Method: Family session Yes Yes (evaluated version) Family Night
Delivery mechanism Method: Game No Yes (evaluated version)
Delivery mechanism Method: Home visiting No
Delivery mechanism Method: Homework assignment No
Delivery mechanism Method: In-session assignment Yes Yes (evaluated version) Activities are completed during outreach throughout
Delivery mechanism Method: Introduction Yes Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #1: 9th Grade Orientation; Outreach #2: Activity Day; Outreach #3: Question Bags, Outreach #4: Pieces of Me
Delivery mechanism Method: Lecture No
Delivery mechanism Method: Motivational interviewing No
Delivery mechanism Method: Music No
Delivery mechanism Method: Parent-focused activity Yes Yes (evaluated version)
Delivery mechanism Method: Peer-to-peer Yes Yes (evaluated version)
Delivery mechanism Method: Public service announcement No Optional This may be a part of the service-learning component
Delivery mechanism Method: Reading No Yes (evaluated version)
Delivery mechanism Method: Role play/Practice Yes Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #20: Decisions, Decisions; Outreach #21: Clear Communication
Delivery mechanism Method: Self-guided activity Yes (evaluated version)
Delivery mechanism Method: Service learning Yes Yes (evaluated version) Service Learning (Option 1 or Option 2)
Delivery mechanism Method: Slide show No
Delivery mechanism Method: Social media No
Delivery mechanism Method: Spiral learning No
Delivery mechanism Method: Storytelling No Yes (evaluated version) Outreach #8: I Am...; Outreach #10: Me as a Tree; Outreach #19: Pockets
Delivery mechanism Method: Text message Optional Text messages may be used with school approval for reaching out to outreach participants between outreaches
Delivery mechanism Method: Video Optional May be used during the service learning component
Delivery mechanism Method: Other
Program Objectives

PGC-HS aims to support youth with their transition from middle school into high school and to develop social and emotional skills, enhance student engagement, and improve educational outcomes. The program prepares 11th and 12th grade student peer leaders to facilitate weekly outreach sessions with 9th graders through a year-long (or equivalent), credit-bearing leadership course taught by school staff known as faculty advisors. The program also includes a Family Night to facilitate communication between caregivers and their children.

Program Content

PGC-HS is rooted in social and emotional learning (SEL) and social learning theory. Weekly outreach sessions cover the following topics: 

  • Relationship skills
  • School engagement 
  • Self-awareness and self-management
  • Educational aspirations and expectations
  • Conflict resolution 
  • Motivation 
  • Goal setting 
  • Coping skills 
  • Communication skills 
  • Decision making
  • Peer acceptance
Program Methods

PGC-HS is a peer-led, curriculum-based intervention that includes interactive group activities, role-playing simulations and games, and discussions.

Program Structure and Timeline

The program begins with a three-day retreat, during which faculty advisors introduce peer leaders to PGC-HS goals and expectations and focus on group development and cohesion. In addition to the initial leadership training retreat, peer leaders participate in ongoing training through a daily leadership course taught by faculty advisors.

Following the three-day leadership training retreat for peer leaders, they work in pairs with small groups of 9th grade students to facilitate a daylong retreat, known as Activity Day, to introduce participating 9th graders to PGC-HS goals. By the third week of implementation, participating 9th graders begin attending a minimum of 18 45-minute weekly outreach sessions led by 11th and 12th grade peer leaders. The ideal peer group size is 10 to 14 9th graders per team of two peer leaders. During the second half of the school year, 9th graders use skills acquired from the outreach sessions to plan and execute a service-learning project. On average, the program includes at least 10.5-13.5 hours of content for 9th grade youth in addition to the service learning project.

The program also has a caregiver component, in which peer leaders organize and facilitate a Family Night for 9th graders and their primary caregivers that focuses on communication.

When the PGC-HS participants reach 10th grade, there is an option to offer three 2.5-hour booster activities led by 11th and 12th grade peer leaders to reinforce content from the outreach sessions in which they participated as 9th grade students. There are a total of three two and a half hour booster sessions, designed to reinforce skills.

Staffing

The program is supported by four key groups: 

  1. The stakeholder team supports the integration of the program into the school and typically includes school staff, parents and caregivers, and students. The stakeholder team identifies and selects school staff to become faculty advisors and teach the daily leadership course to peer leaders. The stakeholder team includes a stakeholder team coordinator (STC) who serves as the primary liaison to the Center for Supportive Schools (CSS) staff and helps facilitate the program. The STC schedules technical assistance visits made by CSS staff to observe the peer leadership class and 9th grade outreach sessions, collects school data (attendance, discipline, grades) for program evaluation, collects implementation data, and coordinates an evaluation survey administered to peer leaders and 9th grade participants. STCs also meet monthly with selected school staff and the full stakeholder team to ensure goals are met before, during, and after program implementation.
  2. Two selected school staff members serve as faculty advisors and participate in an 11-day train-the-trainer course over 18 months to learn how to run the program and co-teach the daily leadership course.
  3. School faculty and staff are trained to serve as PGC-HS ambassadors, who help support program implementation by observing the outreach sessions and providing feedback to faculty advisors on peer leaders’ skills and effectiveness. 
  4. 11th and 12th grade student peer leaders are trained in a daily leadership development class and facilitate weekly outreach sessions with small groups of 9th grade students. Peer leaders are selected based on application materials, group interviews, academic records, and a demonstrated commitment to participating in the program. Careful consideration is given to ensuring that peer leaders are representative (that is race, ethnicity, academic abilities, extracurricular interests) of the student body of their school community.
Staff Training

Faculty advisors and the STC participate in an 11-day “train-the-trainer” course facilitated by the CSS. The train-the-trainer course typically takes place over 18 months and teaches school staff how to run the program and deliver the daily peer leadership training class. Stakeholder team members also receive training to understand the tools and resources needed to implement the program with fidelity. 

Selected peer leaders will participate in a year-long leadership training course to prepare them to conduct weekly outreach sessions. The course is part of their regular school schedule. Peer leaders will also participate in two leadership training retreats. The daily class and retreats are designed to teach peer leaders how to serve as positive role models, facilitate and lead small group discussions, and act as mentors to 9th graders. 

Program Materials and Resources

Faculty advisors use the PGC-HS Advisor Handbook, which includes the curriculum for the initial three-day leadership training retreat, the daily peer leadership development class, and a mid-program leadership training retreat. Peer leaders use the PGC-HS Outreach Handbook, which contains the content of each of the weekly outreach sessions and associated handouts. Additional materials (that is, cards, game boards) to support the outreach sessions are available for purchase.

Additional Needs for Implementation

The daily leadership course requires a designated classroom space and appropriate space to host concurrent small-group outreach sessions during the same class period. A designated retreat site, meals, and transportation are necessary to conduct the retreat with peer leaders and faculty. Additional chaperones may be needed for the retreat, depending on school needs.

Fidelity

PGC-HS should be implemented as the developer intended, with all required components of the program being completed, including the outreach sessions, peer leadership, Family Night, and service learning. School implementation sites can opt to apply to become recognized as a certified program site for excellence in program implementation with high fidelity.

Technical Assistance and Ongoing Support

The STC is responsible for coordinating technical assistance and coaching visits made by the CSS staff. CSS program staff provide technical assistance and coaching support to faculty advisors, the STC, and the stakeholder team members through site visits and observations, video and phone coaching sessions, and email.

Allowable Adaptations

Adaptations are allowed in consultation with the program developer. For example, the program can be adjusted for different populations or translated into other languages. Virtual implementation resources and guidelines are available.

Adaptation Guidelines or Kit
Yes
Reviewed Studies
Citation High-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment Low Study Rating Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria

Walsh et al. (under review)

Study Characteristics
Citation Setting Majority Age Group Majority Racial/Ethnic Group Gender Sample Size

Walsh et al. (under review)

In school: High school 14 to 17 Hispanic or Latinx of any race Youth of any gender n.a.
Study Findings

Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study

Citation Sexual Activity Number of Sexual Partners Contraceptive Use STIs or HIV Pregnancy

Walsh et al. (under review)

Potentially favorable evidence n.a. Indeterminate evidence n.a. n.a.
KEY
Evidence Indication
Favorable findings
Two or more favorable impacts and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Potentially favorable findings
At least one favorable impact and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Indeterminate findings
Uniformly null findings
Conflicting findings
At least one favorable and at least one unfavorable impact, regardless of null findings
Potentially unfavorable findings
At least one unfavorable impact and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Unfavorable findings
Two or more unfavorable impacts and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Note: n.a. indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within that particular outcome domain, or the study examined outcome measures within that domain but the findings did not meet the review evidence standards.
Detailed Findings
Citation Details

Walsh et al. (under review)

The program was evaluated using a randomized controlled trial involving 9th grade students in 18 high schools in New York City and rural North Carolina. Youth were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received the semester- or yearlong Peer Group Connection-High School (PGC-HS) program or a control group that received class as usual. Surveys were administered at the beginning of 9th grade before PGC-HS programming was offered (baseline) and at the beginning of 10th grade (follow-up).



The study found that at the follow-up in the beginning of 10th grade, youth participating in the program were significantly less likely to report having ever had vaginal sex (effect size = -0.14). The study found no statistically significant program impacts on the other eligible outcomes examined: sexual initiation, frequency of sex in the past three months, number of sexual partners in the past three months, or vaginal sex without a condom in the past three months.



The study also examined program impacts on measures of decision-making skills, goal-setting skills, perceived connection with peers, and school engagement. Findings for these outcomes were not considered for the review because they fell outside the scope of the review.

Notes

Some study entries may include more than one citation because each citation examines a different follow-up period from the same study sample, or because each citation examines a different set of outcome measures on the same study sample. A blank cell indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within the particular outcome domain or the findings for the outcome measures within that domain did not meet the review evidence standards.

Information on evidence of effectiveness is available only for studies that received a high or moderate rating. Read the description of the review process for more information on how these programs are identified.