Study Details
Rotheram-Borus, M.J., Lee, M., Leonard, N., Lin, Y.Y., Franzke, L., Turner, E., Lightfoot, M., Gwadz, M. (2003). Four-year behavioral outcomes of an intervention for parents living with HIV and their adolescent children. AIDS, 17, 1217-1225.
Rotheram-Borus, M.J., Lee, M., Lin, Y.Y., Lester, P. (2004). Six-year intervention outcomes for adolescent children of parents with the human immunodeficiency virus. Archives of Pedicatric Adolescent Medicine 158, 742-748.
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Stein, J. A., Lester, P. (2006). Adolescent adjustment over six years in HIV-affected families. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(2), 174-182.
May, S., Lester, P., Ilardi, M., Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2006). Childbearing among daughters of parents with HIV. American Journal of Health Behavior, 30(1), 72-84.
Project TALC
Program Information
Evaluation Setting
Study Sample
Research Design
413
12
0
Study Findings
The study evaluated the program using a cluster randomized controlled trial involving adolescents whose parents were living with HIV. The evaluation was conducted in community centers located in New York City. Families were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received the Project TALC program or a control group that received only the standard services provided by the New York City Division of AIDS Services. The study collected data with surveys that were administered periodically over a 4-year period—every 3 months during the first 2 years of the study and every 6 months afterwards. The study found that four years after the program started, adolescents from families that were assigned to the treatment group were statistically significantly less likely to report being a teenage parent than adolescents from families that were assigned to the control group. The study found no statistically significant program impact on the number of sexual partners. The study also examined program impacts on measures of emotional distress, problem behaviors, self-esteem, and family life stressors. Findings for these outcomes were not considered for the review because they fell outside the scope of the review.