Study Details

Citation

Slater, H.M., and Mitschke, D.B. (2015). "Evaluation of the Crossroads Program in Arlington, TX: Findings from an Innovative Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program" Arlington, TX: University of Texas at Arlington.

Program or Component Study?
Program
Program or Component Name

Crossroads

Show Evidence of Effectiveness
Yes
Study Rating and Explanation
High

Random assignment study that met all criteria for a high rating; findings show a positive, statistically significant impact for at least one behavioral outcome

Program Information

Program Type
Sexual health education
Program Length
Fewer than 10 sessions

Evaluation Setting

Evaluation Setting
After school

Study Sample

Average Age Group
18 or 19
Majority Racial/Ethnic Group
Hispanic or Latino
Sex
Male and female youth

Research Design

Assignment Method
Randomized controlled trial
Sample Size

1174

Number of Follow-Ups

3

Length of Last Follow-Up

12

Year of Last Data Collection
2015

Study Findings

Result Contraceptive Use
Potentially favorable evidence
Reviewed Studies
High-Quality Randomized Trial
Protocol Version
Version 5.0
Details

The program was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial involving 1,174 adolescents classified as high risk for dropping out of high school. The adolescents were recruited to participate in the study from one alternative and six traditional high schools in the Arlington Independent School District in Texas. The intervention was implemented outside the regular school day (in the afternoon and during the weekend) in a community-based setting for three consecutive days. Study surveys were administered and three, six, and twelve months after the intervention ended.

Six months after the intervention, adolescents participating in the intervention were significantly less likely than those in the study control group to report having had vaginal intercourse without using a condom in the past three months (odds ratio = 0.38, confidence interval = 0.59 to 0.79). The study found no statistically significant program impacts on having anal or oral sexual intercourse without a condom at the six-month follow-up. For the follow-up conducted 3 months after the program ended, the study found no evidence of statistically significant program impacts on having vaginal, anal, and oral sexual intercourse without a condom.

The study also examined program impacts on having sexual activity without using a condom and on ever being pregnant 12 months after the program ended. However, the findings for the 12-month follow-up did not meet the review standards because they were based on a sample with high attrition.

Effect Sizes
{"0": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Anal intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.07","MeanComp":"0.07","TpperES":"0.027","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"1": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Anal intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"3","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.06","MeanComp":"0.07","TpperES":"-0.100","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"2": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Anal intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"12","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.09","MeanComp":"0.09","TpperES":"-0.044","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"3": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Oral intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.43","MeanComp":"0.40","TpperES":"0.057","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"4": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Oral intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"12","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.43","MeanComp":"0.43","TpperES":"-0.002","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"5": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Oral intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"3","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.43","MeanComp":"0.41","TpperES":"0.042","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"6": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Vaginal intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"12","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.40","MeanComp":"0.43","TpperES":"-0.067","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"7": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Vaginal intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.32","MeanComp":"0.40","TpperES":"-0.230","StatSigRepEffect":"Yes","RepEffectFavorable":"Yes","RepEffectMeet":"Yes"},"8": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Vaginal intercourse without a condom","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"3","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.35","MeanComp":"0.37","TpperES":"-0.045","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"9": {"ProgramName":"Crossroads\/Turning the Corner Achievement Program (TCAP)","StudyID":"PPRER016002","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016002","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Ever been pregnant","OutcomeDomain":"Pregnancy","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"12","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.25","MeanComp":"0.22","TpperES":"0.077","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"}}

NA = Not available. This means the authors did not report the information in the manuscripts associated with the studies we reviewed.

a This information was not available whenever authors did not report information for the treatment and comparison groups separately on outcome means, standard deviations, and/or sample sizes.

b Authors reported that the program effect (impact) estimate is statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test.

c For some outcomes, having less of that outcome is favorable. In those cases, an effect with a negative sign is favorable to the treatment group (that is, the treatment group had a more favorable outcome than the comparison group, on average).

d An effect shows credibly estimated, statistically significant evidence whenever it has a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test, includes the appropriate adjustment for clustering (if applicable), and it is not based on an endogenous subgroup.

Language directly from the program model developer or authors.