Study Details
Martin, S., Hill, A., Nye M., Hollman-Billmeier, K. (2015) Evaluation of Alaska Promoting Health Among Teens, Comprehensive Abstinence and Safer Sex (AKPHAT) in Alaska. Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage.
Promoting Health Among Teens! Comprehensive Abstinence and Safer Sex Intervention
Program Information
Evaluation Setting
Study Sample
Research Design
302
1
6
Study Findings
A subsequent study by a separate group of researchers used a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Alaska Promoting Health Among Teens, Comprehensive Abstinence and Safer Sex (AKPHAT) program, an adaptation of the PHAT-Comprehensive program. The study adapted the PHAT-Comprehensive program to: (1) use peer educators to deliver the program instead of adult facilitators, (2) serve a different target population of older youth in rural areas, (3) use talking circles and talking sticks, and (4) use fingers rather than a penis model in the condom demonstrations module. The study involved 302 Alaskan Native youth recruited from four non-profit organizations serving youth in Alaska. Adolescents participating in the study were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received the AKPHAT program or a control group that received the standard services available to youth in their schools and communities. The study administered surveys before the program started (baseline), and again immediately, three, six, and 12 months after the end of the program.
Six months after the program ended, the study found no evidence of statistically significant program impacts on sexual activity in the last three months or on having sex without using a condom in the last three months.
NA = Not available. This means the authors did not report the information in the manuscripts associated with the studies we reviewed.
a This information was not available whenever authors did not report information for the treatment and comparison groups separately on outcome means, standard deviations, and/or sample sizes.
b Authors reported that the program effect (impact) estimate is statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test.
c For some outcomes, having less of that outcome is favorable. In those cases, an effect with a negative sign is favorable to the treatment group (that is, the treatment group had a more favorable outcome than the comparison group, on average).
d An effect shows credibly estimated, statistically significant evidence whenever it has a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test, includes the appropriate adjustment for clustering (if applicable), and it is not based on an endogenous subgroup.