Study Details

Citation

The Policy Research Group (2015b). Evaluation of Safer Sex Intervention in New Orleans, LA: Findings from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program. New Orleans, LA: Jenner, E., Walsh, S., Jenner, L. W., Demby, H., Gregory, A.

Program Name

Safer Sex Intervention (SSI)

Show Evidence of Effectiveness
No
Study Rating and Explanation
High —

Random assignment study that met all criteria for a high rating; findings show no positive, statistically significant impact on a relevant behavioral outcome measure for either the full sample or key subgroups

Program Information

Program Type
Sexual health education
Program Length
Fewer than 10 sessions

Evaluation Setting

Evaluation Setting
Health clinic or medical facility

Study Sample

Average Age Group
14 to 17
Majority Racial/Ethnic Group
African American or Black
Gender
Young women

Research Design

Assignment Method
Randomized controlled trial
Sample Size

319

Number of Follow-Ups

1

Length of Last Follow-Up

6

Year of Last Data Collection
2015

Study Findings

Result Sexual Activity
Indeterminate evidence
Result Contraceptive
Indeterminate evidence
Reviewed Studies
High-Quality Randomized Trial
Protocol Version
Version 5.0
Effect Sizes
{"0": {"ProgramName":"Safer Sex Intervention","StudyID":"PPRER016013","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016013","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Inconsistency of condom use","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"No","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of program","MeanTreat":"0.50","MeanComp":"0.46","TpperES":"0.062","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"1": {"ProgramName":"Safer Sex Intervention","StudyID":"PPRER016013","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016013","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Inconsistency of contraceptive use","OutcomeDomain":"Contraceptive Use","OutcomeDichotomous":"No","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of program","MeanTreat":"0.38","MeanComp":"0.23","TpperES":"0.218","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"2": {"ProgramName":"Safer Sex Intervention","StudyID":"PPRER016013","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016013","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Frequency of Sex","OutcomeDomain":"Sexual Activity","OutcomeDichotomous":"No","SampleType":"Full sample","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of program","MeanTreat":"17.40","MeanComp":"13.69","TpperES":"0.103","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"}}

NA = Not available. This means the authors did not report the information in the manuscripts associated with the studies we reviewed.

a This information was not available whenever authors did not report information for the treatment and comparison groups separately on outcome means, standard deviations, and/or sample sizes.

b Authors reported that the program effect (impact) estimate is statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test.

c For some outcomes, having less of that outcome is favorable. In those cases, an effect with a negative sign is favorable to the treatment group (that is, the treatment group had a more favorable outcome than the comparison group, on average).

d An effect shows credibly estimated, statistically significant evidence whenever it has a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test, includes the appropriate adjustment for clustering (if applicable), and it is not based on an endogenous subgroup.

Details

Six months after the program ended, the study found no evidence of statistically significant program impacts on the number of times in the past three months the study participants reported having had sex. The study also found no statistically significant program impacts on the proportion of times in the past three months that the young women in the study's sample had sex without using a condom or without using any type of contraceptives.