Study Details

Citation

Elaine M. Walker; Inoa, R,. Coppola, N. (2016). Evaluation of Promoting Health Among Teens Abstinence-Only Intervention in Yonkers, NY. Sametric Research. Princeton, N.J. 08540

Program Name

Promoting Health Among Teens! Abstinence-Only Intervention

Show Evidence of Effectiveness
No
Study Rating and Explanation
High —

Random assignment study that met all criteria for a high rating; findings show no positive, statistically significant impact on a relevant behavioral outcome measure for either the full sample or key subgroups

Program Information

Program Type
Sexual risk avoidance
Program Length
Fewer than 10 sessions

Evaluation Setting

Evaluation Setting
After school

Study Sample

Average Age Group
13 or younger
Majority Racial/Ethnic Group
Hispanic or Latinx of any race
Gender
Youth of any gender

Research Design

Assignment Method
Randomized controlled trial
Sample Size

1319

Number of Follow-Ups

3

Length of Last Follow-Up

12

Year of Last Data Collection
2016

Study Findings

Result Sexual Activity
Indeterminate evidence
Reviewed Studies
High-Quality Randomized Trial
Protocol Version
Version 5.0
Effect Sizes
{"0": {"ProgramName":"Promoting Health Among Teens! Abstinence-Only Intervention","StudyID":"PPRER016016","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016016","sid":"166","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Ever had sex","OutcomeDomain":"Sexual Activity","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Subgroup--BL sexually experienced","FUTimingMonths":"3","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.02","MeanComp":"0.02","TpperES":"0.000","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"1": {"ProgramName":"Promoting Health Among Teens! Abstinence-Only Intervention","StudyID":"PPRER016016","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016016","sid":"166","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Ever had sex","OutcomeDomain":"Sexual Activity","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Subgroup--BL sexually experienced","FUTimingMonths":"6","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.01","MeanComp":"0.01","TpperES":"0.102","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"},"2": {"ProgramName":"Promoting Health Among Teens! Abstinence-Only Intervention","StudyID":"PPRER016016","ManuscriptID":"PPRER016016","sid":"166","Rating":"High","OutcomeName":"Ever had sex","OutcomeDomain":"Sexual Activity","OutcomeDichotomous":"Yes","SampleType":"Subgroup--BL sexually experienced","FUTimingMonths":"12","FUReference":"End of Program","MeanTreat":"0.01","MeanComp":"0.02","TpperES":"-0.296","StatSigRepEffect":"No","RepEffectFavorable":"Not significant","RepEffectMeet":"No"}}

NA = Not available. This means the authors did not report the information in the manuscripts associated with the studies we reviewed.

a This information was not available whenever authors did not report information for the treatment and comparison groups separately on outcome means, standard deviations, and/or sample sizes.

b Authors reported that the program effect (impact) estimate is statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test.

c For some outcomes, having less of that outcome is favorable. In those cases, an effect with a negative sign is favorable to the treatment group (that is, the treatment group had a more favorable outcome than the comparison group, on average).

d An effect shows credibly estimated, statistically significant evidence whenever it has a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test, includes the appropriate adjustment for clustering (if applicable), and it is not based on an endogenous subgroup.

Details

A more recent study by a separate group of researchers evaluated PHAT-AO using a randomized controlled trial that involved 1,319 adolescents attending 6th and 7th grades in public schools in Yonkers, New York. Adolescents participating in the study were randomly assigned either to a treatment group that received the 8-module PHAT-AO program or a control group that received a general health curriculum, the Promoting Health Among Teens! Health Intervention. Surveys were administered before random assignment (baseline), and again three, six, and 12 months after the end of the program.

At each of the three follow-ups, the study found no evidence of statistically significant program impacts on the likelihood of ever having sex among the subgroup of adolescents who were sexually inexperienced at baseline.