SiHLE

Developers
Ralph DiClemente, Ph.D., Gina Wingood, Sc.D. M.P.H., Kathy Harrington, Delia Lang, Susan Davies, Edward Hook III, M. Kim Oh, Richard Crosby, Ph.D., Vicki Stover Hertzberg, Angelita Gordon, James Hardin, Ph.D., Shan Parker, and Alyssa Robillard.
Program Summary

SiHLE - Sisters, Informing, Healing, Living, Empowering - is a peer-led, group-level, social-skills training intervention designed to reduce sexual risk behaviors among African-American female teenagers who are at high risk of HIV. In addition to HIV prevention, the program addresses relationships, dating, and sexual health within the specific context of the female African-American teenage experience. The program draws upon both cultural and gender pride to give participants the skills and motivations to avoid HIV and other STDs.

Intended Population
The target population is heterosexual African-American females between the ages of 14 and 18 who have had sexual intercourse and are at risk for HIV. The program was evaluated with patients at community health agencies.
Program Setting

The program was designed for and evaluated in community-based organizations and health clinics.

Contact and Availability Information

Sociometrics Corporation
1580 W. El Camino Real, Suite 8
Mountain View, CA 94040
Ph: 650-949-3282
Email: socio@socio.com
Website: https://www.socio.com/products/pasha-sihle-health-workshops-for-young-black-women

Currently no formal training offered

Sample of Curriculum Available for Review Prior to Purchase
No
Languages Available
English
Monitoring and Evaluation Tools
Monitoring and evaluation tools available
Yes
Monitoring and evaluation tool usage required
No
Information about available monitoring and evaluation tools (if applicable)

Sociometrics offers the evaluation instruments used in the original implementation of the program and the Prevention Minimum Evaluation Data Set, a generic questionnaire that can be adapted to suit most prevention programs.

Program Core Components

Last updated in 2023

The data presented on this page reflects responses from the program’s developer or distributor to a program component checklist that asked them to report on the individual components within their TPP program. The same program component checklist was sent to the developer or distributor of every active TPP program with evidence of effectiveness. The program component table provides data on seven types of program components including content, delivery mechanism, dosage, staffing, format, environment, and intended population characteristics; whether the component was present or optional in the program; whether the component is considered to be core to the program; and the lesson number or activity where the component can be found in the program. For more details, refer to the FAQ.

Category Component Core Component Component present Notes Lesson number(s) / activities where present
Content School engagement No
Content Anatomy/physiology No
Content Other No
Content Volunteering/civic engagement No
Content Spirituality Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content Morals/values No
Content Identity development Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content Social support/capital Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 3 & 4
Content Social influence/actual vs. perceived social norms Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content Social competence Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 3 & 4
Content Parenting skills No
Content Normative beliefs No
Content Leadership No
Content Gender roles No
Content Gender identity No
Content Cultural values Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content Connections with trusted adults No Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content Conflict resolution/social problem solving Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 3 & 4
Content Communication skills Yes Yes (both versions) Session 3 & 4
Content Child development No
Content Boundary setting/refusal skills Yes Yes (both versions) Session 3
Content Substance use cessation No
Content Substance use - Other drugs No
Content Substance use - Alcohol No
Content Substance use - Abstinence No
Content Brain development and substance use No
Content Vocational/skills training No
Content Supplemental academic services No
Content Graduating from high school No
Content College preparation No
Content Alternative schooling No
Content Self-regulation No Yes (both versions) Session 4
Content Self-esteem No
Content Self-efficacy/empowerment Yes Yes (both versions) Session 1
Content Resilience No
Content Sexual health Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content STIs - Treatment Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 2 & 4
Content STIs - Screening Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 2 & 4
Content STIs - Prevention Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 2 & 4
Content STIs - Information Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 2 & 4
Content Sexual risk reduction Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 2 & 4
Content Sexual risk discontinuation Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 2 & 4
Content Sexual risk avoidance Yes Yes (both versions) Sessions 1 & 4
Content Personal vulnerability No
Content Maternal health No
Content Contraception - Condoms Yes Yes (both versions) Session 2 & 4
Content Contraception - Long-acting reversible contraceptives No
Content Contraception - Other No
Content Contraception - Pills, patches, rings, and shots No
Content Reproduction No
Program Objectives
The goal of the SiHLE program is to teach social skills to reduce risky sexual behaviors among participants. The program seeks to increase assertive communication skills, condom use skills, and self-efficacy.  
Program Content
The four SiHLE sessions focus on educating teens on HIV transmission and risk reduction strategies by: 
  • Developing assertive communication skills to demonstrate care for their partners and to negotiate abstinence or safer sex behaviors (particularly condom use and involvement of partners in decision-making)
  • Building proper condom use skills (including learning how to place a condom on a partner) and positive attitudes, norms and self-efficacy about consistent condom use
  • Understanding of characteristics of healthy and unhealthy relationships and the triggers that make negotiating safer sex challenging for teens, and
  • Empowerment and self-efficacy, based on cultural and gender pride
Program Methods
The program is delivered by one facilitator and two peer mentors through group discussion, role play, activities, and games. Review of previous information is built in throughout the sessions to reinforce knowledge and offer opportunities for questions to be answered.
Program Structure and Timeline

The program is delivered in four sessions that are each four hours long. The ideal group size is 10 to 12 participants with one adult and two peer facilitators.

The program must be delivered in community-based settings, not in school or during school hours.

Staffing

The program requires the use of one adult and two peer facilitators, all of whom should be African American and female. Peer facilitators should be between 18- and 21-years-old who, ideally, have gone through the SiHLE program. There are specific roles for the adult and peer facilitators described in the facilitator's manual.

Staff Training
There is no required training for this program. In the past several organizations have offered formal training, but none are currently specified.
Program Materials and Resources

The following program materials are available through the distributor:

  • User's Guide
  • SiHLE Facilitators Manual
  • Photocopy masters of posters
  • Participant Handbook
  • Photocopy masters of additional handouts, the SiHLE Jeopardy game, session evaluations
  • 50 Domestic violence brochures
  • Prevention Minimum Evaluation Data Set (PMEDS)
  • Local Evaluator Consultant Network Directory
  • Original Evaluation Instruments

While a free sample curriculum is not available, providers may purchase an automatic digital download of the user’s guide to review program components, core competencies for facilitators, and scientific evidence of effectiveness. If providers decide to purchase the program, the price of the download is deducted.

Additional Needs for Implementation
Delivery of the program requires the use of condoms and penis models.
Fidelity
SiHLE has a fidelity toolkit/checklist and tools for monitoring program implementation. These may be accessed on the Sociometrics website: https://www.socio.com/products/pasha-sihle-health-workshops-for-young-black-women 
Technical Assistance and Ongoing Support
Sociometrics provides telephone technical support on implementation and evaluation for one year with purchase of the program materials.
Allowable Adaptations
All adaptations must be approved by the developer, in consultation with Sociometrics.
Adaptation Guidelines or Kit
No
Reviewed Studies
Citation High-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Randomized Trial Moderate-Quality Quasi-Experiment Low Study Rating Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Harrington, K. F., Lang, D. L., Davies, S. L., Hook, E. W., et al. (2004). Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(2), 171-179.

Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harringon, K. F., et al. (2006). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among female adolescents experiencing gender-based violence. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1085-1090.

Sales, J. M., Lang, D. L., Hardin, J. W., DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M. (2010). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among African American female adolescents reporting high depressive symptomatology. Journal of Women's Health, 19(2), 219-227.

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Rose, E., Sales, J. M., Crosby, R. A. (2010). Evaluation of an HIV/STD sexual risk-reduction intervention for pregnant african american adolescents attending a prenatal clinic in an urban public hospital: Preliminary evidence of efficacy. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 23(1), 32.

Klein, C. H., Card, J. J. (2011). Preliminary efficacy of a computer-delivered HIV prevention intervention for African American teenage females. AIDS Education and Prevention, 23(6), 564-576.

Danielson, C. K., McCauley, J. L., Jones, A. M., Borkman, A. L., Miller, S., Ruggiero, K. J. (2013). Feasibility of delivering evidence-based HIV/STI prevention programming to a community sample of african american teen girls via the internet. AIDS Education and Prevention, 25(5), 394-404.

Study Characteristics
Citation Setting Majority Age Group Majority Racial/Ethnic Group Gender Sample Size

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Harrington, K. F., Lang, D. L., Davies, S. L., Hook, E. W., et al. (2004). Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(2), 171-179.

Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harringon, K. F., et al. (2006). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among female adolescents experiencing gender-based violence. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1085-1090.

Sales, J. M., Lang, D. L., Hardin, J. W., DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M. (2010). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among African American female adolescents reporting high depressive symptomatology. Journal of Women's Health, 19(2), 219-227.

After school 14 to 17 African American or Black Young women

522

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Rose, E., Sales, J. M., Crosby, R. A. (2010). Evaluation of an HIV/STD sexual risk-reduction intervention for pregnant african american adolescents attending a prenatal clinic in an urban public hospital: Preliminary evidence of efficacy. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 23(1), 32.

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Klein, C. H., Card, J. J. (2011). Preliminary efficacy of a computer-delivered HIV prevention intervention for African American teenage females. AIDS Education and Prevention, 23(6), 564-576.

After school 14 to 17 African American or Black Young women

178

Danielson, C. K., McCauley, J. L., Jones, A. M., Borkman, A. L., Miller, S., Ruggiero, K. J. (2013). Feasibility of delivering evidence-based HIV/STI prevention programming to a community sample of african american teen girls via the internet. AIDS Education and Prevention, 25(5), 394-404.

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Study Findings

Evidence by Outcome Domain and Study

Citation Sexual Activity Number of Sexual Partners Contraceptive Use STIs or HIV Pregnancy

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Harrington, K. F., Lang, D. L., Davies, S. L., Hook, E. W., et al. (2004). Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(2), 171-179.

Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harringon, K. F., et al. (2006). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among female adolescents experiencing gender-based violence. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1085-1090.

Sales, J. M., Lang, D. L., Hardin, J. W., DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M. (2010). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among African American female adolescents reporting high depressive symptomatology. Journal of Women's Health, 19(2), 219-227.

n.a. Potentially favorable evidence Favorable evidence Potentially favorable evidence Potentially favorable evidence

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Rose, E., Sales, J. M., Crosby, R. A. (2010). Evaluation of an HIV/STD sexual risk-reduction intervention for pregnant african american adolescents attending a prenatal clinic in an urban public hospital: Preliminary evidence of efficacy. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 23(1), 32.

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Klein, C. H., Card, J. J. (2011). Preliminary efficacy of a computer-delivered HIV prevention intervention for African American teenage females. AIDS Education and Prevention, 23(6), 564-576.

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Danielson, C. K., McCauley, J. L., Jones, A. M., Borkman, A. L., Miller, S., Ruggiero, K. J. (2013). Feasibility of delivering evidence-based HIV/STI prevention programming to a community sample of african american teen girls via the internet. AIDS Education and Prevention, 25(5), 394-404.

n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
KEY
Evidence Indication
Favorable findings
Two or more favorable impacts and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Potentially favorable findings
At least one favorable impact and no unfavorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Indeterminate findings
Uniformly null findings
Conflicting findings
At least one favorable and at least one unfavorable impact, regardless of null findings
Potentially unfavorable findings
At least one unfavorable impact and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Unfavorable findings
Two or more unfavorable impacts and no favorable impacts, regardless of null findings
Note: n.a. indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within that particular outcome domain, or the study examined outcome measures within that domain but the findings did not meet the review evidence standards.
Detailed Findings
Citation Details

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Harrington, K. F., Lang, D. L., Davies, S. L., Hook, E. W., et al. (2004). Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(2), 171-179.

Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harringon, K. F., et al. (2006). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among female adolescents experiencing gender-based violence. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1085-1090.

Sales, J. M., Lang, D. L., Hardin, J. W., DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M. (2010). Efficacy of an HIV prevention program among African American female adolescents reporting high depressive symptomatology. Journal of Women's Health, 19(2), 219-227.

The program's evidence of effectiveness was first established in a randomized controlled trial involving sexually active African American females recruited from four community health agencies in the southern United States. Study participants were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received the intervention or a control group that received a general health promotion intervention on nutrition and exercise. Surveys were administered immediately before the intervention and at follow- ups conducted 6 and 12 months after the intervention. Biological testing for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomonas was also conducted.

The study found that six months after the intervention, adolescents participating in the intervention were significantly less likely to report having a pregnancy and significantly more likely to report consistent condom use in the past 6 months. Adolescents participating in the intervention were significantly more likely to report having used a condom during last sex, reported a significantly higher percentage of condom-protected sexual intercourse acts during both the past 30 days and the past 6 months, were less likely to have had a new vaginal sex partner in the last 30 days, and reported significantly fewer episodes of unprotected sexual intercourse during both the past 30 days and the past 6 months. The study found no statistically significant impacts on self-reported condom use in the past 30 days.

The study found that twelve months after the intervention, adolescents participating in the intervention were significantly more likely to report consistent condom use in the both the past 30 days and the past 6 months. Adolescents participating in the intervention were significantly more likely to report using a condom during last sex, reported a significantly higher percentage of condom-protected sexual intercourse acts during both the past 30 days and the past 6 months, and reported significantly fewer episodes of unprotected sexual intercourse during both the past 30 days and the past 6 months. The study found no statistically significant program impacts on self-reported pregnancy in the past 6 months.

During the 12-month follow-up period, adolescents participating in the intervention were significantly less likely to have a chlamydia infection. The study found no statistically significant program impacts on gonorrhea or trichomonas infections.

DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Rose, E., Sales, J. M., Crosby, R. A. (2010). Evaluation of an HIV/STD sexual risk-reduction intervention for pregnant african american adolescents attending a prenatal clinic in an urban public hospital: Preliminary evidence of efficacy. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 23(1), 32.

Klein, C. H., Card, J. J. (2011). Preliminary efficacy of a computer-delivered HIV prevention intervention for African American teenage females. AIDS Education and Prevention, 23(6), 564-576.

This study evaluated an adapted version of the SiHLE program with a randomized controlled trial involving African American female adolescents in the San Francisco Bay Area. The adapted "Multimedia" version of the program comprised two one-hour sessions delivered individually by computer. Study participants were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received the intervention or to a control group that received a general health education session. Surveys were administered immediately before random assignment (baseline) and three months after baseline.The study examined changes in rates of sexual risk behaviors between the baseline and three-month follow-up surveys. However, the study did not test for differences in these outcomes between the treatment and control groups. The study also examined measures of condom-use self-efficacy, knowledge, sexual-communication self-efficacy. Findings for these outcomes were not considered for the review because they fell outside the review of the review.

Danielson, C. K., McCauley, J. L., Jones, A. M., Borkman, A. L., Miller, S., Ruggiero, K. J. (2013). Feasibility of delivering evidence-based HIV/STI prevention programming to a community sample of african american teen girls via the internet. AIDS Education and Prevention, 25(5), 394-404.

Notes

Some study entries may include more than one citation because each citation examines a different follow-up period from the same study sample, or because each citation examines a different set of outcome measures on the same study sample. A blank cell indicates the study did not examine any outcome measures within the particular outcome domain or the findings for the outcome measures within that domain did not meet the review evidence standards.

Information on evidence of effectiveness is available only for studies that received a high or moderate rating. Read the description of the review process for more information on how these programs are identified.