Youth Involved with the Juvenile Justice System
Some children and youth become involved with the juvenile justice system because they are accused of committing a delinquent or criminal act. Other youth encounter the system for status offenses—actions that are illegal only because of a youth’s age—such as truancy, underage drinking, and running away from home. Not all of these cases, however, are formally processed through the courts.
What do we know about youth involved in the juvenile justice system?
- While an estimated 2.7 million youth under the age of 18 were arrested in the United States during a single year in 1997, that number decreased by 74 percent in 2019.1
- Though overall rates have been steadily declining over the past years, approximately 423,077 delinquency cases are adjudicated and disposed in juvenile courts annually. Fifty-two percent (220,000) of those disposed cases were adjudicated delinquent in 2018.2
- Youth are referred to the juvenile justice system for different types of offenses. Figure 1 illustrates the percent of referrals based on the types of offenses for youth between the ages of 12 and 17 in 2018.3
Figure 1: Percent of Juvenile Court Involvement Charges by Type for Youth Between the Ages of 12 and 17 in 2018

Data source: https://ojjdp. ojp. gov/publications/delinquency-cases-in-juvenile-court-2018. PDF (PDF, 4 pages)
Adjudicated Youth
While many youth cases do not get processed formally through the court, the majority of youth that are processed through the juvenile court are adjudicated (i. e., declared by a judge to be) delinquent, for most offenses.
- An average of 53 percent of all petitioned cases that went to juvenile court were adjudicated delinquent in 2019. Fifty-one percent of person offenses were adjudicated delinquent, 53 percent of property offenses, 51 percent of drug offences, and 56 percent of public order offenses. 4
- Between 1997 and 2019, the number of youth detained in residential placement decreased 50 percent to a total of 14,344, and the number of youth committed in residential placement decreased 73 percent to 21,141. The total number of youth in residential placement in 2019 was 36,479, its lowest level since the data collection began in 1997, when 105,055 youth were held in out-of-home placement. 5
- The average state cost for the secure confinement of a young person is now $588 per day, or $214,620 per year, a 44 percent increase from 2014. These cost figures over a six-year period represent the growing economic impact of incarcerating youth. However, the long-term impact of these policies extends well beyond the fiscal cost. 6
- Youth who are detained or incarcerated may be subject to various negative circumstances, including:
- overcrowding
- physical and sexual violence
- risk of suicide
- death7
Limiting incarceration as a punitive measure for youth when applicable has strong potential to mitigate some of these negative circumstances that occur in or are exacerbated by various out-of-home placement settings.
Repeated Involvement
Recidivism,8 as measured by various levels of reinvolvement with the justice system (e.g., rearrest, probation violations, reincarceration), is fairly high for youth under the age of 21. However, according to a follow-up study on previously incarcerated youth, most youth who committed serious offenses reduced their offending over time regardless of interventions, and (92%) experienced decreased or limited illegal activity during the first three years following their encounter with the juvenile justice system. The only two factors that played notable roles in rearrest rates in this seven-year study were:9
- The presence of substance use disorder. Youth with a substance use disorder were more likely to continue to offend over the 7-year study period and less likely to spend time working or attending school than those with no substance use disorder. Youth who used substances more often and in greater quantity were more likely to be arrested than less frequent users, a pattern that did not change over time.
- Quality services and positive experiences in institutions. The quality of youth services, the degree to which services were matched to individual youth’s needs, and a positive institutional experience and facility environment were associated with reduced rates of rearrest. These results suggest that investing in improved care and support services in facilities has potential to reduce rearrest rates and future involvement with the justice system.
Additionally, studies show that academic measures are predictive of chances of recidivism.
- Incarcerated boys between the ages of 12-18 who have high or average academic performance while in a correctional facility are two times less likely to engage in repeated involvement with the justice system after release than those with lower academic performance who are in a remedial education group while in a facility.10
- In a study of more than 4,000 juveniles released from secure facilities in Florida, youth with above average academic performance during the time they were confined were more likely to return to school upon release than their lower-performing peers, a notable finding given the fact that above average attendance in school serves as a protective factor against being arrested.11
Educational Status and Outcomes
Many youth who encounter the juvenile justice system have experienced academic failure, disengagement from school, and/or school disciplinary challenges. Academic outcomes for these youth are generally less positive than those of youth who do not encounter the system, suggesting that academic interventions may be a strong avenue for serving youth at risk of entering the juvenile justice system.
- Nearly half of all students who enter residential juvenile justice facilities have an academic achievement level that is below the grade equivalent for their age.12
- Youth in the juvenile justice system are identified as eligible for special education services at three to seven times the rate of youth outside the system.13
- Many incarcerated youth are marginally literate or illiterate and have already experienced school failure.14
- Many youth who are incarcerated have a history of truancy and grade retention (repeating a grade due to failing the previous year). A study of more than 400 incarcerated ninth-graders found that, in the year prior to incarceration, these students had attended school barely half the time and were failing most of their courses.15 Youth with high truancy who later get funneled into the juvenile justice system are also more likely to have received special education services than their peers who had strong school attendance.16
- Exclusionary discipline practices such as expulsion or suspension significantly increase a student’s likelihood of becoming involved in the juvenile justice system rather than mitigating delinquent behaviors. Alternative disciplinary measures that do not remove at-risk students from the school setting prove more beneficial for youth.17
Considering the substantial correlation between academic failure and/or truancy and involvement with the juvenile justice system, academic interventions and truancy reduction programs provide promise for improving youth outcomes.
Mental Health and Substance Use
Youth involved with the juvenile justice system often have mental health18 and/or substance use disorders. These typically affect their academic performance, behavior, and relationships with peers and adults.
- Studies point to a significant overrepresentation of youth with mental health disorders in the juvenile justice system, with a high percentage of youth (approximately 70 percent) involved in the system having a diagnosable mental health disorder and nearly 30 percent of those experiencing severe mental health disorders.19
- About two thirds of youth in detention or correctional settings have at least one diagnosable mental health disorder, compared with an estimated 9 to 22 percent of the general youth population.20
- Many youth in the juvenile justice system have a history of trauma and ensuing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders which are all correlated with later delinquency and/or involvement in the system.21 Particularly, adolescents who witnessed or were survivors of violence are more likely to be charged with a violent crime against another individual later.
- Academic progress and high academic performance weaken this relationship between early violence-related trauma and juvenile justice involvement, serving as a protective factor against involvement with the juvenile justice system. 22
- Youth in contact with the juvenile justice system experience higher prevalence rates for various categories of mental disorders than their peers. In addition to experiencing a high prevalence of disruptive disorders, the most common mental health challenge for these youth is substance use disorder (76 percent), followed by high anxiety (33 percent), ADHD (14 percent), depression (12 percent), posttraumatic stress disorder (12 percent), and mania (7 percent).23
- Most youth in the system meet the criteria for or are diagnosed with more than one mental health disorder.24
- Many court-involved adolescents have recently used illegal substances. The adolescents who perpetrate more serious and chronic offenses have been found to use more substances and are more likely to qualify for a diagnosis of a substance use disorder.25
- Between 2005 and 2018, drug law violations among youth decreased by 44 percent.26
- Higher levels of substance use increase the rate of offending, the severity of the committed offense, and the duration of antisocial behavior.27
Despite the exceedingly high proportion of youth within the juvenile justice system who experience mental health disorders, referral rates for mental health treatment within justice facilities remain low.28
Targeted trainings for juvenile correctional facility professionals regarding mental health screening and treatment referrals would point more youth toward the necessary treatment for their unique needs. Particularly, mental health diversion initiatives and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) which helps patients adjust their thinking and behavior patterns have shown positive results in reducing delinquency and recidivism among justice-involved youth.29
Resources for Justice-Involved Youth and Their Families
Model Programs Guide: Substance Abuse
The Model Programs Guide contains evidence-based juvenile justice and youth prevention, intervention, and reentry programs. Each program is rated either effective, promising, or no effect. Users can search the database for programs and interventions based on the age range of the child or young adult or can use other search filters to search for programs addressing substance use.
National Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk (NDTAC)
This website serves as an information hub, technical assistance center, resource for program evaluation and data reporting, and a facilitator of information and peer-to-peer learning in relation to educational programming for youth who are neglected, delinquent, or at-risk of entering the juvenile justice system. Users can access webinars and conferences on the site and explore resources for parents, families, and service providers for neglected or delinquent youth.
Vulnerable Population: Incarcerated Youth
For youth, parents, community members, or practitioners who need a starting point to familiarize themselves with the juvenile justice system and processes, this fact sheet may be a good place to start. It provides basic definitions and fast facts as well as links to various government reports and publications focusing on the juvenile justice system.
Resources for Community Partners
Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2023
This database allows users to view and analyze statistics on nearly every cross-section of youth populations present in residential placement over the span of 28 years. Developed to facilitate analysis of national data on delinquent youth held in these out-of-home facilities, this website provides yearly information on youth demographics and characteristics, including sex, race/ethnicity, age, length of stay in residential placement, nature of offense, and more.
Fact Sheet Template: Complex Trauma in Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth (PDF, 7 pages)
This fact sheet contains a detailed description of the path from complex trauma exposure to involvement in the juvenile justice system. The source also provides recommendations for judges and juvenile justice program administrators, parents and family members, and adults who supervise youth regarding how to best serve and understand justice-involved youth.
Intersection between Mental Health and the Juvenile Justice System (PDF, 13 pages)
This literature review focuses on the scope of mental health challenges of at-risk and justice-involved youth, the impact of mental health on justice involvement as well as the impact of justice involvement on mental health, and disparities in mental health treatment in the juvenile justice system. Evidence-based programs that have been shown to improve outcomes for youth with mental health issues are explored.
Education for Youth Under Formal Supervision of the Juvenile Justice System (PDF, 18 pages)
This literature review discusses the intersection of the educational and the juvenile justice systems. It outlines the academic characteristics and challenges of youth in the juvenile justice system (including those in detention and long-term secure residential facilities, and under probation supervision) and interventions aimed at improving educational outcomes for this high-risk population.
Model Programs Guide: Substance Abuse
The Model Programs Guide is an online resource of evidence-based juvenile justice and youth prevention, intervention, and reentry programs. Each program is rated either effective, promising, or no effect. Users can search the database for programs and interventions based on the age range of the child or young adult or can use other search filters to find programs addressing substance use.
Preventing Child Abuse & Neglect
This webpage features a list of resources related to child abuse prevention, protecting children from risk of abuse, and strengthening families.
National Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Neglected or Delinquent Children & Youth
This website serves as an information hub, technical assistance center, resource for program evaluation and data reporting, and a facilitator of information and peer-to-peer learning in relation to educational programming for youth who are neglected, delinquent, or at-risk of entering the juvenile justice system. Users can access webinars and conferences on the site and explore resources for parents, families, and service providers for neglected or delinquent youth.
Resources for Practitioners
Youth and the Juvenile Justice System: 2022 National Report (PDF, 226 pages)
This is the fifth edition of a comprehensive report from the National Center for Juvenile Justice on youth victimization, offenses committed by youth, and the juvenile justice system's response. The report — previously called "Juvenile Offenders and Victims" — provides juvenile justice practitioners and policymakers with information on youth and their involvement with the juvenile justice system through the 2019 data year.
Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach (PDF, 27 pages)
This paper introduces SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and offers a framework for how an organization, system, or service sector can become trauma informed by integrating the perspectives of researchers, practitioners, and people with experience of trauma.
Tool Kit for Creating Your Own Truancy Reduction Program (PDF, 229 pages)
This toolkit provides a comprehensive analysis of the causes of truancy, the extent of the issue, evaluation measures for truancy reduction programs and barriers to accurate progress measurement, as well as best practices for managing truancy reduction among youth.
Understanding Child Trauma
This infographic provides key statistics and information to help the public recognize the signs of child traumatic stress. This infographic can be downloaded as a whole or by the three key subject areas.
Wraparound Process Literature Review (PDF, 7 pages)
This literature review explains how the wraparound process addresses gaps that delinquent youth with severe emotional and behavioral disorders previously experienced in the justice system, provides ten key principles of the wraparound process, and describes positive impacts of such programming.
References/Footnotes
1 Puzzanchera, 2021
2 Hockenberry, 2020
3 Hockenberry, 2020
4 Puzzanchera & Hockenberry, 2021
5 Puzzanchera, 2021; Hockenberry, 2020
6 Justice Policy Institute, 2020
7 Sickmund, M. & Puzzanchera, C., 2014
8 Accurately estimating a nation-wide recidivism rate is very difficult because jurisdictions do not use the same measures to define it and great variance exists, depending on what is measured.
9 Sickmund & Puzzanchera, 2014
10 Archwamety & Katsiyannis, 2000; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2019
11 Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2019; Blomberg, Bales & Piquero, 2012
12 Sedlak & McPherson, 2010; Hovey, Zolkoski & Bullock, 2017
13 Leone & Weinberg, 2010
14 Krezmien & Mulcahy, 2008
15 Balfanz, Spiridakis, Neild, & Legters, 2003
16 Zhang et al., 2010
17 Gerlinger et al., 2021
18 Although there is a clear and strong correlation between mental health disorders and involvement in the juvenile justice system, a causal relationship cannot be determined between the two based on existing research. It is unclear which factor may be the precipitator for the other, or if such a causal relationship even exists.
19 Skowyra & Cocozza, 2007; Meservey & Skowyra, 2015; Teplin et al., 2013; Development Services Group, Inc., 2017
20 Schubert & Mulvey 2014; Schubert, Mulvey, & Glasheen 2011; Development Services Group, Inc., 2017
21 Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice, 2006; Felitti et al., 1998; and Quinn, Rutherford, & Leone, 2001
22 Wyrick & Atkinson, 2021
23 Schubert, Mulvey, & Glasheen, 2011; Schubert & Mulvey, 2014
24 Schubert, Mulvey, & Glasheen, 2011; Teplin et al., 2013; Development Services Group, Inc., 2017
25 Mulvey, Schubert, & Chassin, 2010
26 Hockenberry & Puzzanchera, 2021
27 Young, Dembo, & Henderson, 2007
28 Developmental Services Group, 2017
29 Developmental Services Group, 2017; Jeong, Lee, & Martin, 2014; Colwell, Villarreal, & Espinosa, 2012